An enhance ranging algorithm based on multi-waveform classification with hyperspectral LiDAR

IF 5.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xingyun Li , Hui Shao , Yuan Lu , Yuwei Chen , Long Sun , Hui Dai , Tao Hong , Xinyuan Zhang , Hulong Zhang
{"title":"An enhance ranging algorithm based on multi-waveform classification with hyperspectral LiDAR","authors":"Xingyun Li ,&nbsp;Hui Shao ,&nbsp;Yuan Lu ,&nbsp;Yuwei Chen ,&nbsp;Long Sun ,&nbsp;Hui Dai ,&nbsp;Tao Hong ,&nbsp;Xinyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Hulong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.measurement.2025.117489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>When the light detection and ranging (LiDAR) detected system interrogates targets with high <em>retro</em>-reflective properties, the backscattered pulse energy is prone to exceed the maximum receiving range of the photodetector. It will cause signal saturation because the system cannot record the complete echo waveform, which leads to the deviation of ranging results. To solve the problem, this study proposes an enhanced ranging algorithm based on multi-waveform classification (RMWC) with 101-band hyperspectral LiDAR (HSL). Considering the difference of echo waveform collected in different bands, the threshold method is combined with random forest classifier to classify echo waveforms into normal waveform, saturated waveform and U-shaped waveform. Then peak value method (PV), centroid method (CM) and waveform fitting method (WF) are selected to calculate the corresponding time of flight of the three waveforms respectively. Finally, the target distance is determined by the weighted average of the mode values of the bands’ ranging results. Compared with PV, CM and WF ranging results at 905 nm, the experimental results verify that the proposed algorithm can effectively reduce the ranging error caused by waveform saturation. For planar <em>retro</em>-reflection target, the average error (<em>AE</em>) is 0.0053 m and the standard deviation (<em>Std</em>) is less than 0.0083 m. For diffuse reflection whiteboard, the <em>AE</em> is 0.0010 m and the <em>Std</em> is 0.0053 m. The reconstruction results of planar target point cloud show that RMWC ranging results are better than these traditional single-band ranging methods, which can provide a reference for the optimal design of high precision laser ranging system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18349,"journal":{"name":"Measurement","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 117489"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263224125008486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When the light detection and ranging (LiDAR) detected system interrogates targets with high retro-reflective properties, the backscattered pulse energy is prone to exceed the maximum receiving range of the photodetector. It will cause signal saturation because the system cannot record the complete echo waveform, which leads to the deviation of ranging results. To solve the problem, this study proposes an enhanced ranging algorithm based on multi-waveform classification (RMWC) with 101-band hyperspectral LiDAR (HSL). Considering the difference of echo waveform collected in different bands, the threshold method is combined with random forest classifier to classify echo waveforms into normal waveform, saturated waveform and U-shaped waveform. Then peak value method (PV), centroid method (CM) and waveform fitting method (WF) are selected to calculate the corresponding time of flight of the three waveforms respectively. Finally, the target distance is determined by the weighted average of the mode values of the bands’ ranging results. Compared with PV, CM and WF ranging results at 905 nm, the experimental results verify that the proposed algorithm can effectively reduce the ranging error caused by waveform saturation. For planar retro-reflection target, the average error (AE) is 0.0053 m and the standard deviation (Std) is less than 0.0083 m. For diffuse reflection whiteboard, the AE is 0.0010 m and the Std is 0.0053 m. The reconstruction results of planar target point cloud show that RMWC ranging results are better than these traditional single-band ranging methods, which can provide a reference for the optimal design of high precision laser ranging system.
基于多波形分类的高光谱激光雷达增强测距算法
当激光雷达(LiDAR)探测系统询问具有高反反射特性的目标时,后向散射脉冲能量容易超过光电探测器的最大接收范围。由于系统无法记录完整的回波波形,会造成信号饱和,导致测距结果出现偏差。为了解决这一问题,本研究提出了一种基于多波形分类(RMWC)的101波段高光谱激光雷达(HSL)增强测距算法。考虑到不同波段采集回波波形的差异性,将阈值法与随机森林分类器相结合,将回波波形分为正常波形、饱和波形和u形波形。然后分别采用峰值法(PV)、质心法(CM)和波形拟合法(WF)计算三种波形对应的飞行时间。最后,对各波段测距结果的模态值进行加权平均,确定目标距离。与905 nm处的PV、CM和WF测距结果对比,实验结果验证了所提算法能有效降低波形饱和引起的测距误差。对于平面反射目标,平均误差(AE)为0.0053 m,标准差(Std)小于0.0083 m。漫反射白板的AE为0.0010 m, Std为0.0053 m。平面目标点云的重建结果表明,RMWC测距结果优于传统的单波段测距方法,可为高精度激光测距系统的优化设计提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Measurement
Measurement 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
12.1 months
期刊介绍: Contributions are invited on novel achievements in all fields of measurement and instrumentation science and technology. Authors are encouraged to submit novel material, whose ultimate goal is an advancement in the state of the art of: measurement and metrology fundamentals, sensors, measurement instruments, measurement and estimation techniques, measurement data processing and fusion algorithms, evaluation procedures and methodologies for plants and industrial processes, performance analysis of systems, processes and algorithms, mathematical models for measurement-oriented purposes, distributed measurement systems in a connected world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信