Young Gwan Lee , Marziyeh Bahalou Horeh , Levan Elbakidze
{"title":"Economic evaluation of lettuce traceability systems in mitigating foodborne illness risks","authors":"Young Gwan Lee , Marziyeh Bahalou Horeh , Levan Elbakidze","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Foodborne illnesses in fresh produce markets pose a significant public health risk. Although traceability systems are recognized for their potential to mitigate contamination impacts, the economic benefits of such systems remain underexplored. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the value of traceability in managing foodborne illness outbreaks using lettuce as a case study. We quantify the economic benefits of lettuce traceability and assess its sensitivity to contamination severity (quantity and virulence of the pathogen), pathogen persistence (survival of the pathogen on produce over time), and illness latency (time from exposure to symptoms of infection). Using an economic model with a pathogen dose–response formulation, we simulate the economic and health impacts of E. coli contamination originating from irrigation water. The results indicate that traceability benefits range from $4 to $91 million per outbreak, depending on shelf life, contamination severity, and latency of illness symptoms. Shorter shelf lives and contamination severity amplify the benefits. Traceability reduces illness by swiftly identifying and removing contaminated produce from the supply chain. The findings highlight the cost-effectiveness of traceability systems, especially for managing frequent or severe outbreaks. The study also demonstrates the contextual sensitivity of tracing benefits that stakeholders, including producers, retailers, and policymakers, should consider. Future studies should consider alternative contexts where benefit and costs may deviate from the estimates in this study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 102855"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000594","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Foodborne illnesses in fresh produce markets pose a significant public health risk. Although traceability systems are recognized for their potential to mitigate contamination impacts, the economic benefits of such systems remain underexplored. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the value of traceability in managing foodborne illness outbreaks using lettuce as a case study. We quantify the economic benefits of lettuce traceability and assess its sensitivity to contamination severity (quantity and virulence of the pathogen), pathogen persistence (survival of the pathogen on produce over time), and illness latency (time from exposure to symptoms of infection). Using an economic model with a pathogen dose–response formulation, we simulate the economic and health impacts of E. coli contamination originating from irrigation water. The results indicate that traceability benefits range from $4 to $91 million per outbreak, depending on shelf life, contamination severity, and latency of illness symptoms. Shorter shelf lives and contamination severity amplify the benefits. Traceability reduces illness by swiftly identifying and removing contaminated produce from the supply chain. The findings highlight the cost-effectiveness of traceability systems, especially for managing frequent or severe outbreaks. The study also demonstrates the contextual sensitivity of tracing benefits that stakeholders, including producers, retailers, and policymakers, should consider. Future studies should consider alternative contexts where benefit and costs may deviate from the estimates in this study.
期刊介绍:
Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies.
Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.