Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Measurement Invariance of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) in Transgender and Gender-Diverse Adults.
Jason M Nagata, Christopher D Otmar, Audrey Lopez, Emilio J Compte, Jason M Lavender, Tiffany A Brown, Kelsie T Forbush, Annesa Flentje, Micah E Lubensky, Juno Obedin-Maliver, Mitchell R Lunn
{"title":"Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Measurement Invariance of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) in Transgender and Gender-Diverse Adults.","authors":"Jason M Nagata, Christopher D Otmar, Audrey Lopez, Emilio J Compte, Jason M Lavender, Tiffany A Brown, Kelsie T Forbush, Annesa Flentje, Micah E Lubensky, Juno Obedin-Maliver, Mitchell R Lunn","doi":"10.1002/eat.24433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties, including factor structure, internal consistency, and measurement invariance of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) in a large national sample of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample consisted of 2098 TGD adults-including transgender men (n = 599), transgender women (n = 293), and gender-diverse individuals (n = 1206)-who completed online self-report surveys. Using a subset of the sample, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify underlying factor structures, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm the model fit within each population in the remainder of the sample. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) was used to assess measurement invariance across transgender men, transgender women, and gender-diverse individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EPSI's eight-factor structure was supported across all three TGD groups with strong model fit: transgender men (CFI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.047, SRMR = 0.078), transgender women (CFI = 0.948, RMSEA = 0.048, SRMR = 0.085), and gender-diverse individuals (CFI = 0.962, RMSEA = 0.040, SRMR = 0.060). Measurement invariance analyses supported that the EPSI was invariant across the groups, facilitating meaningful group comparisons using the inventory. Internal consistency, assessed using McDonald's omega, was acceptable for all subscales (ω = 0.74-0.94).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides psychometric support for the EPSI in TGD groups. The results indicate that the EPSI performs reliably and consistently across these groups for assessing eating pathology among gender minority people.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24433","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties, including factor structure, internal consistency, and measurement invariance of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) in a large national sample of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) adults.
Method: The sample consisted of 2098 TGD adults-including transgender men (n = 599), transgender women (n = 293), and gender-diverse individuals (n = 1206)-who completed online self-report surveys. Using a subset of the sample, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify underlying factor structures, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm the model fit within each population in the remainder of the sample. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) was used to assess measurement invariance across transgender men, transgender women, and gender-diverse individuals.
Results: The EPSI's eight-factor structure was supported across all three TGD groups with strong model fit: transgender men (CFI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.047, SRMR = 0.078), transgender women (CFI = 0.948, RMSEA = 0.048, SRMR = 0.085), and gender-diverse individuals (CFI = 0.962, RMSEA = 0.040, SRMR = 0.060). Measurement invariance analyses supported that the EPSI was invariant across the groups, facilitating meaningful group comparisons using the inventory. Internal consistency, assessed using McDonald's omega, was acceptable for all subscales (ω = 0.74-0.94).
Discussion: This study provides psychometric support for the EPSI in TGD groups. The results indicate that the EPSI performs reliably and consistently across these groups for assessing eating pathology among gender minority people.
期刊介绍:
Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.