Bridging the (structural) gap: HR practitioners as brokers of the space between academics and employee informants

IF 8.2 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Hugh T.J. Bainbridge , Jessica R. Methot
{"title":"Bridging the (structural) gap: HR practitioners as brokers of the space between academics and employee informants","authors":"Hugh T.J. Bainbridge ,&nbsp;Jessica R. Methot","doi":"10.1016/j.hrmr.2025.101089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human resource (HR) practitioners are regularly contacted by academic researchers who seek access to interviewees and/or survey respondents within the HR practitioner’s organisation. However, despite interest in closing the research-practice gap, there has been limited consideration of the HR practitioner’s role in the conduct of organisational field research. To address this, we draw upon insights from the social networks literature on brokerage to propose that HR practitioners can function as <em>research brokers</em>—individuals behaving as intermediaries between internal and external organisational stakeholders to control or facilitate academic research activities. We integrate the literatures on network brokerage and boundary management strategies to develop a typology of HR practitioner brokering behaviours. We identify which conditions lend themselves to productive brokering that can facilitate the execution of research project partnerships. We outline challenges faced by HR practitioners in the research brokerage role and approaches for addressing these challenges. Finally, we identify opportunities for furthering the examination of research brokerage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48145,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management Review","volume":"35 3","pages":"Article 101089"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053482225000142","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human resource (HR) practitioners are regularly contacted by academic researchers who seek access to interviewees and/or survey respondents within the HR practitioner’s organisation. However, despite interest in closing the research-practice gap, there has been limited consideration of the HR practitioner’s role in the conduct of organisational field research. To address this, we draw upon insights from the social networks literature on brokerage to propose that HR practitioners can function as research brokers—individuals behaving as intermediaries between internal and external organisational stakeholders to control or facilitate academic research activities. We integrate the literatures on network brokerage and boundary management strategies to develop a typology of HR practitioner brokering behaviours. We identify which conditions lend themselves to productive brokering that can facilitate the execution of research project partnerships. We outline challenges faced by HR practitioners in the research brokerage role and approaches for addressing these challenges. Finally, we identify opportunities for furthering the examination of research brokerage.
弥合(结构性)差距:人力资源从业者作为学者和员工信息提供者之间空间的经纪人
学术研究人员定期与人力资源从业人员联系,这些研究人员寻求接触人力资源从业人员组织内的受访者和/或调查受访者。然而,尽管人们对缩小研究与实践之间的差距很感兴趣,但对人力资源从业者在组织实地研究中的作用的考虑却很有限。为了解决这个问题,我们借鉴了社交网络文献中关于中介的见解,提出人力资源从业者可以作为研究中介——个人作为内部和外部组织利益相关者之间的中介,以控制或促进学术研究活动。我们整合网络中介和边界管理策略的文献,发展人力资源从业人员中介行为的类型学。我们确定哪些条件有利于促进研究项目合作伙伴关系的执行。我们概述了人力资源从业者在研究经纪角色中面临的挑战以及解决这些挑战的方法。最后,我们确定了进一步审查研究经纪的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Human Resource Management Review (HRMR) is a quarterly academic journal dedicated to publishing scholarly conceptual and theoretical articles in the field of human resource management and related disciplines such as industrial/organizational psychology, human capital, labor relations, and organizational behavior. HRMR encourages manuscripts that address micro-, macro-, or multi-level phenomena concerning the function and processes of human resource management. The journal publishes articles that offer fresh insights to inspire future theory development and empirical research. Critical evaluations of existing concepts, theories, models, and frameworks are also encouraged, as well as quantitative meta-analytical reviews that contribute to conceptual and theoretical understanding. Subject areas appropriate for HRMR include (but are not limited to) Strategic Human Resource Management, International Human Resource Management, the nature and role of the human resource function in organizations, any specific Human Resource function or activity (e.g., Job Analysis, Job Design, Workforce Planning, Recruitment, Selection and Placement, Performance and Talent Management, Reward Systems, Training, Development, Careers, Safety and Health, Diversity, Fairness, Discrimination, Employment Law, Employee Relations, Labor Relations, Workforce Metrics, HR Analytics, HRM and Technology, Social issues and HRM, Separation and Retention), topics that influence or are influenced by human resource management activities (e.g., Climate, Culture, Change, Leadership and Power, Groups and Teams, Employee Attitudes and Behavior, Individual, team, and/or Organizational Performance), and HRM Research Methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信