Intersectionality matters: An analysis of women’s empowerment among livestock holders in Nepal, Senegal and Uganda

IF 5.4 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Renata Serra , Sarah McKune , Nargiza Ludgate , Nitya Singh , Kabita Devkota , Mouhamed Fall , Gordon Obin , Alioune Touré , Chhavi Tiwari , Sandra Russo
{"title":"Intersectionality matters: An analysis of women’s empowerment among livestock holders in Nepal, Senegal and Uganda","authors":"Renata Serra ,&nbsp;Sarah McKune ,&nbsp;Nargiza Ludgate ,&nbsp;Nitya Singh ,&nbsp;Kabita Devkota ,&nbsp;Mouhamed Fall ,&nbsp;Gordon Obin ,&nbsp;Alioune Touré ,&nbsp;Chhavi Tiwari ,&nbsp;Sandra Russo","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many tools have been deployed to measure women’s empowerment in development contexts, but few have explicitly adopted an intersectional lens when studying livestock holders. This paper uses an intersectional approach to analyze qualitative (Focus Group Discussions, FGDs) and quantitative data (using the Women’s Empowerment in Livestock Index, WELI) for livestock-holding communities in Nepal, Senegal, and Uganda. Our analysis focuses on the intersection between gender and caste in Nepal, and gender and ethnicity in Senegal and Uganda. Findings from 71 FGDs reveal important differences in the gender distribution of livestock-related roles by caste or ethnic groups and in conceptualizations of women’s empowerment. Multivariate regressions for individual empowerment scores derived from the WELI (821 men and women interviewed separately) show that, in Senegal and Uganda, differences in empowerment indicators by gender are statistically significant even when ethnicity is considered, but further comparisons between ethnic groups reveal deeper insights. Conversely, in Nepal, the most pronounced differences in empowerment are between women (and men) from different castes, while gender differences within each caste are more limited. Qualitative findings help shed further light on these findings by unveiling dimensions of empowerment that are locally deemed important but are not captured by WELI indicators. We also compare the contribution of intrinsic, instrumental, and collective agency indicators to the disempowerment of different gender and intersectional groups and discuss possible reasons for all these differences, aided by the findings from FGDs. We provide recommendations for improving future intersectional analyses employing WELI and mixed-method approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 107000"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X25000853","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many tools have been deployed to measure women’s empowerment in development contexts, but few have explicitly adopted an intersectional lens when studying livestock holders. This paper uses an intersectional approach to analyze qualitative (Focus Group Discussions, FGDs) and quantitative data (using the Women’s Empowerment in Livestock Index, WELI) for livestock-holding communities in Nepal, Senegal, and Uganda. Our analysis focuses on the intersection between gender and caste in Nepal, and gender and ethnicity in Senegal and Uganda. Findings from 71 FGDs reveal important differences in the gender distribution of livestock-related roles by caste or ethnic groups and in conceptualizations of women’s empowerment. Multivariate regressions for individual empowerment scores derived from the WELI (821 men and women interviewed separately) show that, in Senegal and Uganda, differences in empowerment indicators by gender are statistically significant even when ethnicity is considered, but further comparisons between ethnic groups reveal deeper insights. Conversely, in Nepal, the most pronounced differences in empowerment are between women (and men) from different castes, while gender differences within each caste are more limited. Qualitative findings help shed further light on these findings by unveiling dimensions of empowerment that are locally deemed important but are not captured by WELI indicators. We also compare the contribution of intrinsic, instrumental, and collective agency indicators to the disempowerment of different gender and intersectional groups and discuss possible reasons for all these differences, aided by the findings from FGDs. We provide recommendations for improving future intersectional analyses employing WELI and mixed-method approaches.
交叉性很重要:对尼泊尔、塞内加尔和乌干达畜牧业妇女赋权的分析
已经部署了许多工具来衡量发展背景下的妇女赋权,但在研究牲畜饲养者时,很少有工具明确采用交叉视角。本文采用交叉方法分析了尼泊尔、塞内加尔和乌干达畜牧业社区的定性(焦点小组讨论,fgd)和定量数据(使用妇女在畜牧业赋权指数,WELI)。我们的分析重点是尼泊尔的性别和种姓之间的交集,以及塞内加尔和乌干达的性别和种族之间的交集。71个fgd的调查结果揭示了种姓或种族群体在牲畜相关角色的性别分布以及妇女赋权概念方面的重大差异。从WELI(分别采访了821名男性和女性)得出的个人赋权得分的多变量回归表明,在塞内加尔和乌干达,即使考虑到种族因素,性别在赋权指标上的差异在统计上也很显著,但种族群体之间的进一步比较揭示了更深刻的见解。相反,在尼泊尔,不同种姓的女性(和男性)在赋权方面的差异最为明显,而每个种姓内部的性别差异则更为有限。定性调查结果通过揭示当地认为重要但未被WELI指标捕获的赋权维度,有助于进一步阐明这些调查结果。我们还比较了内在、工具和集体代理指标对不同性别和交叉群体的权力剥夺的贡献,并在fgd研究结果的帮助下讨论了所有这些差异的可能原因。我们提出建议,以改善未来的交叉分析采用WELI和混合方法的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Development
World Development Multiple-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
320
期刊介绍: World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信