Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Chronic Migraine in Adults: Study Protocol for a Randomized, Open-Label, Blinded Endpoint Trial.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2025-03-01
Lu Liu, Zhe Sun, Lei Jiang, Fang Luo
{"title":"Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Chronic Migraine in Adults: Study Protocol for a Randomized, Open-Label, Blinded Endpoint Trial.","authors":"Lu Liu, Zhe Sun, Lei Jiang, Fang Luo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic migraine (CM) is a recurring disorder with a relatively poor prognosis. Microinvasive and nonpharmacological therapies are essential for refractory patients with this condition. To date, only nonrandomized trials have reported the efficacy of the stellate ganglion block (SGB) for CM patients. Whether a combination of SGB and drug therapy is an optimal treatment for CM patients must still be confirmed with randomized controlled studies utilizing standardized oral medications as a control.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of the repeated administration of SGBs over a 4-week period on the basis of standardized oral medications for reducing the severity and number of migraine episodes during the course of a 6-month trial in CM patients for whom prophylactic treatment has failed. The aim of this study was to provide more effective nonpharmacological therapies.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A pain clinic in Beijing, China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CM patients from 18 to 65 years of age will be enrolled. Patients unresponsive to migraine prophylaxis will be randomly assigned to receive either SGB with standardized drug therapy (SGB group) or standardized drug therapy alone (drug group) in an effort to determine the efficacy of SGBs for the treatment of CM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The efficacy and safety of the SGB as a CM treatment will be compared to those of the SGB in combination with drug therapy. Differences in pain relief and functional improvement will be assessed. The primary outcome is the change in mean monthly (defined as a 4-week time span) migraine days during the 6-month follow-up period following the patients' first SGB treatment. Secondly, analgesic medication requirements, quality-of-life assessments, and any SGB complications will also be addressed during the 6-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Neither the investigators nor the patients were blinded to treatment allocation. Additionally, this is a short-term follow-up study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is a randomized controlled trial with a relatively large sample size to demonstrate the potential benefits of combined SGBs and drug therapy for CM patients. In the short term, this combined therapy will likely optimize CM treatment management. Further research will be needed to assess the efficacy of this treatment as a long-term therapeutic option.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"28 2","pages":"117-126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic migraine (CM) is a recurring disorder with a relatively poor prognosis. Microinvasive and nonpharmacological therapies are essential for refractory patients with this condition. To date, only nonrandomized trials have reported the efficacy of the stellate ganglion block (SGB) for CM patients. Whether a combination of SGB and drug therapy is an optimal treatment for CM patients must still be confirmed with randomized controlled studies utilizing standardized oral medications as a control.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of the repeated administration of SGBs over a 4-week period on the basis of standardized oral medications for reducing the severity and number of migraine episodes during the course of a 6-month trial in CM patients for whom prophylactic treatment has failed. The aim of this study was to provide more effective nonpharmacological therapies.

Study design: A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial.

Setting: A pain clinic in Beijing, China.

Methods: CM patients from 18 to 65 years of age will be enrolled. Patients unresponsive to migraine prophylaxis will be randomly assigned to receive either SGB with standardized drug therapy (SGB group) or standardized drug therapy alone (drug group) in an effort to determine the efficacy of SGBs for the treatment of CM.

Results: The efficacy and safety of the SGB as a CM treatment will be compared to those of the SGB in combination with drug therapy. Differences in pain relief and functional improvement will be assessed. The primary outcome is the change in mean monthly (defined as a 4-week time span) migraine days during the 6-month follow-up period following the patients' first SGB treatment. Secondly, analgesic medication requirements, quality-of-life assessments, and any SGB complications will also be addressed during the 6-month follow-up period.

Limitations: Neither the investigators nor the patients were blinded to treatment allocation. Additionally, this is a short-term follow-up study.

Conclusions: This study is a randomized controlled trial with a relatively large sample size to demonstrate the potential benefits of combined SGBs and drug therapy for CM patients. In the short term, this combined therapy will likely optimize CM treatment management. Further research will be needed to assess the efficacy of this treatment as a long-term therapeutic option.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信