Efficacy of Nerve Blocks for Managing Refractory Posttraumatic Headaches.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2025-03-01
Christopher File, Xiang Fang, Rowaid Ahmad, Ahmed Harazeen, John Jung, Fauwad Ahmed, Naveed Ahmad, Sean Pappolla, Remi Nader, Miguel A Pappolla
{"title":"Efficacy of Nerve Blocks for Managing Refractory Posttraumatic Headaches.","authors":"Christopher File, Xiang Fang, Rowaid Ahmad, Ahmed Harazeen, John Jung, Fauwad Ahmed, Naveed Ahmad, Sean Pappolla, Remi Nader, Miguel A Pappolla","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nerve blocks (greater occipital, lesser occipital, others) are commonly used, singly or in combination, to treat various forms of refractory headaches, including migraine and cervicogenic headaches. Their efficacy in treating posttraumatic headaches, however, particularly those unresponsive to medications or severely disabling, is not well documented.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize the efficacy of nerve blocks in the treatment of posttraumatic headaches.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single-specialty outpatient neurology clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from January 2022 through July 2023 who fulfilled International Headache Society criteria for posttraumatic headache (i.e., new onset headache developing within the first week following head trauma) were included. A rigorous, comprehensive, and unbiased selection process was followed via Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Headaches were refractory to various treatments, including analgesic agents or headache prophylactic medications. The treatments the study patients received were a combination of nerve blocks, including greater, lesser, and third occipital nerve blocks, and supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve blocks. We used the percentage of pain improvement in order to assess the response to the blocks: minimal improvement (< 50%), moderate improvement (50-75%), and significant improvement (> 75%) pain relief.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients met the inclusion criteria; 15 were women (44%). The mean (SD) age was 43.11 ± 14 years. Of these 34, 28 stated a significant improvement in headache pain immediately following their injection. Twenty-one patients (75%) rated their response to nerve blocks as a >= 90% improvement in headaches. Six patients reported complete resolution of their headache pain. Expressed as percentage headache pain improvement, average pain improvement was 88%. Six patients reported moderate improvement of their headaches.Thirty-one patients reported an average headache improvement of 73% on Postprocedure Day One. Nineteen of these 31 patients had significant pain improvement from baseline, with 12 of them reaching a >= 90% pain improvement. Eight patients reported moderate improvement, while 4 had minimal headache pain improvement. Twenty-seven patients were available for a 3-month follow-up; they reported an average headache improvement of 73%. Thirteen of these patients reported significant improvement in their headache pain, with 12 of them having a >= 90% improvement in their headaches. Twelve patients reported moderate pain improvement, and 2 had minimal or no pain improvement. Nineteen patients returned for a 6-month follow-up; they reported an average pain improvement of 78%. Twelve patients reported significant pain improvement, with 11 having an improvement of >= 90%. Four patients reported moderate pain improvement, and 3 reported minimal or no pain improvement. Some patients experienced a biphasic response with partial headache recurrence at 3 months, followed by complete headache resolution at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Several patients who received multiple nerve blocks were concurrently prescribed prophylactic medications for headache management. Later score improvements cannot be determined to be solely caused by the nerve blocks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective review offers preliminary but compelling evidence that nerve blocks are a highly effective option for patients with posttraumatic headaches who have not benefited from medication or who suffer from severe, incapacitating symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"28 2","pages":"137-145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nerve blocks (greater occipital, lesser occipital, others) are commonly used, singly or in combination, to treat various forms of refractory headaches, including migraine and cervicogenic headaches. Their efficacy in treating posttraumatic headaches, however, particularly those unresponsive to medications or severely disabling, is not well documented.

Objectives: To characterize the efficacy of nerve blocks in the treatment of posttraumatic headaches.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: A single-specialty outpatient neurology clinic.

Methods: Patients from January 2022 through July 2023 who fulfilled International Headache Society criteria for posttraumatic headache (i.e., new onset headache developing within the first week following head trauma) were included. A rigorous, comprehensive, and unbiased selection process was followed via Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Headaches were refractory to various treatments, including analgesic agents or headache prophylactic medications. The treatments the study patients received were a combination of nerve blocks, including greater, lesser, and third occipital nerve blocks, and supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve blocks. We used the percentage of pain improvement in order to assess the response to the blocks: minimal improvement (< 50%), moderate improvement (50-75%), and significant improvement (> 75%) pain relief.

Results: Thirty-four patients met the inclusion criteria; 15 were women (44%). The mean (SD) age was 43.11 ± 14 years. Of these 34, 28 stated a significant improvement in headache pain immediately following their injection. Twenty-one patients (75%) rated their response to nerve blocks as a >= 90% improvement in headaches. Six patients reported complete resolution of their headache pain. Expressed as percentage headache pain improvement, average pain improvement was 88%. Six patients reported moderate improvement of their headaches.Thirty-one patients reported an average headache improvement of 73% on Postprocedure Day One. Nineteen of these 31 patients had significant pain improvement from baseline, with 12 of them reaching a >= 90% pain improvement. Eight patients reported moderate improvement, while 4 had minimal headache pain improvement. Twenty-seven patients were available for a 3-month follow-up; they reported an average headache improvement of 73%. Thirteen of these patients reported significant improvement in their headache pain, with 12 of them having a >= 90% improvement in their headaches. Twelve patients reported moderate pain improvement, and 2 had minimal or no pain improvement. Nineteen patients returned for a 6-month follow-up; they reported an average pain improvement of 78%. Twelve patients reported significant pain improvement, with 11 having an improvement of >= 90%. Four patients reported moderate pain improvement, and 3 reported minimal or no pain improvement. Some patients experienced a biphasic response with partial headache recurrence at 3 months, followed by complete headache resolution at 6 months.

Limitations: Several patients who received multiple nerve blocks were concurrently prescribed prophylactic medications for headache management. Later score improvements cannot be determined to be solely caused by the nerve blocks.

Conclusion: This retrospective review offers preliminary but compelling evidence that nerve blocks are a highly effective option for patients with posttraumatic headaches who have not benefited from medication or who suffer from severe, incapacitating symptoms.

神经阻滞治疗难治性创伤后头痛的疗效。
背景:神经阻滞(大枕神经阻滞,小枕神经阻滞,其他神经阻滞)通常单独或联合用于治疗各种形式的顽固性头痛,包括偏头痛和颈源性头痛。然而,它们在治疗创伤后头痛,特别是那些对药物无反应或严重致残的头痛方面的疗效并没有很好的记录。目的:观察神经阻滞治疗创伤后头痛的疗效。研究设计:回顾性图表回顾。环境:单科门诊神经内科门诊。方法:纳入2022年1月至2023年7月符合国际头痛协会创伤后头痛标准的患者(即头部创伤后第一周内出现新发头痛)。通过加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)指南,遵循严格、全面和公正的选择过程。头痛对各种治疗都是难治性的,包括止痛剂或头痛预防药物。研究患者接受的治疗是神经阻滞的组合,包括大、小和第三枕神经阻滞,以及眶上和滑车上神经阻滞。我们使用疼痛改善的百分比来评估对阻滞的反应:最小改善(< 50%),中度改善(50-75%)和显著改善(> 75%)疼痛缓解。结果:34例患者符合纳入标准;15名女性(44%)。平均(SD)年龄为43.11±14岁。在这34人中,28人表示在注射后头痛立即得到显著改善。21名患者(75%)评价他们对神经阻滞的反应为头痛改善b> = 90%。6例患者报告头痛完全缓解。以头痛改善百分比表示,平均疼痛改善为88%。6名患者报告头痛有中度改善。31例患者报告术后第一天头痛平均改善73%。31例患者中有19例疼痛较基线有明显改善,其中12例达到>= 90%的疼痛改善。8名患者报告有中度改善,4名患者有轻微的头痛改善。27例患者进行了为期3个月的随访;他们报告说,头痛平均改善了73%。其中13名患者的头痛症状有了明显改善,其中12名患者的头痛症状改善了90%。12名患者报告疼痛有中度改善,2名患者疼痛有轻微改善或没有改善。19名患者返回进行6个月的随访;他们报告说,疼痛平均减轻了78%。12例患者报告疼痛明显改善,其中11例患者>= 90%改善。4名患者报告中度疼痛改善,3名患者报告轻微或无疼痛改善。一些患者出现双期反应,3个月时部分头痛复发,6个月时头痛完全消退。局限性:一些接受多次神经阻滞的患者同时服用预防性头痛药物。后来的评分提高不能确定仅仅是由神经阻滞引起的。结论:这项回顾性研究提供了初步但令人信服的证据,表明神经阻滞是创伤后头痛患者的一种非常有效的选择,这些患者没有从药物治疗中获益,或者患有严重的、丧失行为能力的症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信