Contributions of delay, duration, and intensity of shock on rats' choices involving conflicting-valence consequences.

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Forrest Toegel, Aaron D Dumas, Michael Perone
{"title":"Contributions of delay, duration, and intensity of shock on rats' choices involving conflicting-valence consequences.","authors":"Forrest Toegel, Aaron D Dumas, Michael Perone","doi":"10.1002/jeab.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Problems related to \"self-control\" can occur in situations in which a single choice produces both reinforcing and aversive consequences. We exposed rats to choice situations in which a press on one lever produced only food and a press on a second lever produced food and delayed shock. Within and across conditions of four experiments, adjusting-delay procedures were used to identify indifference points-delays at which the consequences produced by the two levers exerted equal control over choice. Experiment 1 investigated the effects of intensity and duration of delayed shock on choice between a small food reinforcer or a large food reinforcer followed by delayed shock. Experiment 3 investigated the effects of shock's delay on choice between food delivered immediately and followed by delayed shock or food delivered after a delay. Experiments 2 and 4 investigated the effects of signaling the delayed shock in Experiments 1 and 3, respectively. The effects of delayed shock on choice were a direct function of shock intensity and shock duration and an inverse function of shock's delay. Signals did not affect choice systematically. The results extend findings from research on the punishment of operant behavior and on the temporal discounting of reinforcing and punishing events.</p>","PeriodicalId":17411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problems related to "self-control" can occur in situations in which a single choice produces both reinforcing and aversive consequences. We exposed rats to choice situations in which a press on one lever produced only food and a press on a second lever produced food and delayed shock. Within and across conditions of four experiments, adjusting-delay procedures were used to identify indifference points-delays at which the consequences produced by the two levers exerted equal control over choice. Experiment 1 investigated the effects of intensity and duration of delayed shock on choice between a small food reinforcer or a large food reinforcer followed by delayed shock. Experiment 3 investigated the effects of shock's delay on choice between food delivered immediately and followed by delayed shock or food delivered after a delay. Experiments 2 and 4 investigated the effects of signaling the delayed shock in Experiments 1 and 3, respectively. The effects of delayed shock on choice were a direct function of shock intensity and shock duration and an inverse function of shock's delay. Signals did not affect choice systematically. The results extend findings from research on the punishment of operant behavior and on the temporal discounting of reinforcing and punishing events.

延迟、持续时间和电击强度对涉及冲突效价后果的大鼠选择的影响。
与“自我控制”相关的问题可能发生在一个选择同时产生强化和厌恶后果的情况下。我们将老鼠置于选择情境中,其中一个杠杆只产生食物,另一个杠杆产生食物并延迟电击。在四个实验的条件内和条件间,使用调整延迟程序来确定无差异点-两个杠杆产生的结果对选择施加同等控制的延迟。实验1考察了延迟休克的强度和持续时间对选择小食物强化剂或大食物强化剂后延迟休克的影响。实验3考察了休克延迟对选择立即和随后延迟休克或延迟后递送食物的影响。实验2和实验4分别在实验1和实验3中研究了延迟休克的信号传导效应。延迟冲击对选择的影响是冲击强度和冲击持续时间的直接函数,是冲击延迟的反函数。信号不会系统性地影响选择。这一结果扩展了操作性行为的惩罚以及强化和惩罚事件的时间贴现的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior is primarily for the original publication of experiments relevant to the behavior of individual organisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信