Spatiomotor Dynamics of Hand Movements During the Drawing of Memory-Guided Trajectories without Visual Feedback.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Christopher W Tyler, Kristyo N Mineff, Michael Liang, Lora T Likova
{"title":"Spatiomotor Dynamics of Hand Movements During the Drawing of Memory-Guided Trajectories without Visual Feedback.","authors":"Christopher W Tyler, Kristyo N Mineff, Michael Liang, Lora T Likova","doi":"10.1152/jn.00153.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the underlying principles of the spatiomotor dynamics during human movement execution are now broadly understood to conform to a Minimum Jerk Principle, the question addressed in the present analysis is whether the same principles operate during human drawing movements without visual feedback, deriving from studies of the Likova Cognitive-Kinesthetic Memory-Drawing Training Paradigm. For two groups of participants, completely blind, and sighted but temporarily blindfolded, this analysis shows that the consensus model of arm-motion kinematics as a simple 1/3rd power relationship of drawing speed to the local curvature of the line being drawn is not a sufficient characterization of their coupling. Instead, the drawing dynamics conform to a hyperbolic power relationship, with a coupling power of approximately 1.0 for regions of the highest curvature, asymptoting to curvature-independence for regions of shallow curvature, for both blind and blindfolded groups. Thus, the asymptotic power was much higher than the 1/3<sup>rd</sup> power predicted from the Minimum Jerk Principle. In detail, the maximum-velocity asymptote for both groups averaged about 6 cm/s for drawing from memory, increasing to more than twice as fast for mindless scribbling. We conclude that the more elaborate operating principle of a hyperbolic saturation function, with a power asymptote of about 1.0, may be interpreted as an adaptive implementation approximating the Minimum Jerk Principle of the simple 1/3<sup>rd</sup> power law relating velocity and curvature.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00153.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the underlying principles of the spatiomotor dynamics during human movement execution are now broadly understood to conform to a Minimum Jerk Principle, the question addressed in the present analysis is whether the same principles operate during human drawing movements without visual feedback, deriving from studies of the Likova Cognitive-Kinesthetic Memory-Drawing Training Paradigm. For two groups of participants, completely blind, and sighted but temporarily blindfolded, this analysis shows that the consensus model of arm-motion kinematics as a simple 1/3rd power relationship of drawing speed to the local curvature of the line being drawn is not a sufficient characterization of their coupling. Instead, the drawing dynamics conform to a hyperbolic power relationship, with a coupling power of approximately 1.0 for regions of the highest curvature, asymptoting to curvature-independence for regions of shallow curvature, for both blind and blindfolded groups. Thus, the asymptotic power was much higher than the 1/3rd power predicted from the Minimum Jerk Principle. In detail, the maximum-velocity asymptote for both groups averaged about 6 cm/s for drawing from memory, increasing to more than twice as fast for mindless scribbling. We conclude that the more elaborate operating principle of a hyperbolic saturation function, with a power asymptote of about 1.0, may be interpreted as an adaptive implementation approximating the Minimum Jerk Principle of the simple 1/3rd power law relating velocity and curvature.

无视觉反馈的记忆引导轨迹绘制过程中手部运动的空间运动动力学。
虽然人类运动执行过程中空间运动动力学的基本原理现在被广泛理解为符合最小震动原理,但在本分析中解决的问题是,在没有视觉反馈的人类绘画运动中,是否同样的原理也在起作用,这源于对利科娃认知-动觉记忆-绘画训练范式的研究。对于两组参与者,完全失明和视力但暂时蒙上眼睛,该分析表明,将手臂运动运动学的共识模型作为绘制速度与正在绘制的线的局部曲率的简单1/3幂关系,并不能充分表征它们的耦合。相反,绘制动力学符合双曲幂关系,对于最高曲率区域的耦合幂约为1.0,对于浅曲率区域的耦合幂渐近于曲率无关,对于盲和蒙眼组都是如此。因此,渐近功率远高于最小扰动原理预测的1/3功率。详细地说,两组的最大速度渐近线平均约为6cm /s,增加到两倍以上的速度无意识涂鸦。我们得出结论,双曲饱和函数的更详细的工作原理,其幂渐近线约为1.0,可以被解释为近似于有关速度和曲率的简单1/3幂律的最小扰动原理的自适应实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信