Longitudinal Relationship Between Parental Psychological Flexibility and Peer Victimization in Children: The Mediating Role of Executive Function and Social Anxiety
Qingqing Li, Xue Shen, Yuqin Tu, Zongkui Zhou, Jing Wang
{"title":"Longitudinal Relationship Between Parental Psychological Flexibility and Peer Victimization in Children: The Mediating Role of Executive Function and Social Anxiety","authors":"Qingqing Li, Xue Shen, Yuqin Tu, Zongkui Zhou, Jing Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10964-025-02170-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prior research shows that parental psychological flexibility can benefit children’s social adjustment, but its role in mitigating peer victimization remains unclear. This study addressed this gap by examining the potential mediating roles of executive function and social anxiety in the longitudinal relationship between parental psychological flexibility and peer victimization. The sample comprised 511 primary school students (grades 4–6; 46.58% girls; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 9.34, <i>SD</i> = 1.10) and their parents, followed three waves across one year. Results showed that parental psychological flexibility was negatively correlated with low executive function, social anxiety, and peer victimization. Structural equation modeling revealed that parental psychological flexibility predicted lower peer victimization both directly and indirectly through two distinct pathways—social anxiety alone and a chained mediation link from executive function to social anxiety. These findings underscore the importance and key explanatory mechanisms of parental psychological flexibility in mitigating the risk of peer victimization among children and early adolescence, offering valuable insights for the development of prevention and intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02170-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prior research shows that parental psychological flexibility can benefit children’s social adjustment, but its role in mitigating peer victimization remains unclear. This study addressed this gap by examining the potential mediating roles of executive function and social anxiety in the longitudinal relationship between parental psychological flexibility and peer victimization. The sample comprised 511 primary school students (grades 4–6; 46.58% girls; Mage = 9.34, SD = 1.10) and their parents, followed three waves across one year. Results showed that parental psychological flexibility was negatively correlated with low executive function, social anxiety, and peer victimization. Structural equation modeling revealed that parental psychological flexibility predicted lower peer victimization both directly and indirectly through two distinct pathways—social anxiety alone and a chained mediation link from executive function to social anxiety. These findings underscore the importance and key explanatory mechanisms of parental psychological flexibility in mitigating the risk of peer victimization among children and early adolescence, offering valuable insights for the development of prevention and intervention strategies.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.