The relative importance of language, gaze, and gesture in deictic reference.

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Gozdem Arikan, Peter Boddy, Kenny R Coventry
{"title":"The relative importance of language, gaze, and gesture in deictic reference.","authors":"Gozdem Arikan, Peter Boddy, Kenny R Coventry","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When people communicate, they use a combination of modalities-speech, gesture, and eye gaze-to engage and transmit information to an addressee. Spatial deictic communication is a paradigmatic case, with spatial demonstratives (<i>this/that</i>) frequently co-occurring with eye gaze and pointing gestures to draw the attention of an addressee to an object location (e.g., <i>this cup, that chair</i>). Yet the effectiveness of these individual modalities in guiding attention has not been established. In two experiments, we manipulated pointing, gazing, and spatial demonstratives to establish their relative and combined effectiveness in directing attention to a specific referent. Participants saw an image (Experiments 1 and 2) or a short video clip (Experiment 2) with a person (agent) sitting behind a table, describing <i>(this, that),</i> gazing, and/or pointing at the items placed proximally or distally relative to the agent. All three modalities individually affected which of the two objects participants thought the person in the picture was referring to. However, pointing was the dominant cue to referent choice, with demonstratives on their own acting as a relatively weak spatial deictic cue. Overall, the effect of spatial demonstratives (Experiments 1 and 2) and gaze (Experiment 2) on attention to a referent was enhanced when coupled with pointing, both when targeting the distal and proximal positions. The results help to illuminate why spatial deictic communication is usually multimodal, with individual modalities contributing different communicative functions in the act of spatial deixis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When people communicate, they use a combination of modalities-speech, gesture, and eye gaze-to engage and transmit information to an addressee. Spatial deictic communication is a paradigmatic case, with spatial demonstratives (this/that) frequently co-occurring with eye gaze and pointing gestures to draw the attention of an addressee to an object location (e.g., this cup, that chair). Yet the effectiveness of these individual modalities in guiding attention has not been established. In two experiments, we manipulated pointing, gazing, and spatial demonstratives to establish their relative and combined effectiveness in directing attention to a specific referent. Participants saw an image (Experiments 1 and 2) or a short video clip (Experiment 2) with a person (agent) sitting behind a table, describing (this, that), gazing, and/or pointing at the items placed proximally or distally relative to the agent. All three modalities individually affected which of the two objects participants thought the person in the picture was referring to. However, pointing was the dominant cue to referent choice, with demonstratives on their own acting as a relatively weak spatial deictic cue. Overall, the effect of spatial demonstratives (Experiments 1 and 2) and gaze (Experiment 2) on attention to a referent was enhanced when coupled with pointing, both when targeting the distal and proximal positions. The results help to illuminate why spatial deictic communication is usually multimodal, with individual modalities contributing different communicative functions in the act of spatial deixis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

语言、凝视和手势在指示指称中的相对重要性。
当人们进行交流时,他们会综合使用多种方式--语言、手势和目光--来吸引对方并向其传递信息。空间指令性交际就是一个典型的例子,空间指示词(这/那)经常与目光和指向手势同时出现,以吸引受话人注意物体的位置(如这个杯子、那把椅子)。然而,这些单独的方式在引导注意力方面的有效性尚未得到证实。在两个实验中,我们对指向、凝视和空间演示进行了操作,以确定它们在将注意力引向特定参照物时的相对有效性和组合有效性。受试者看到的是一幅图像(实验 1 和 2)或一段视频短片(实验 2),画面中一个人(代理人)坐在桌子后面,描述(这个、那个)、凝视和/或指向相对于代理人近距离或远距离放置的物品。所有这三种方式都会影响被试认为图片中的人所指的是两个物体中的哪一个。然而,指向是指代选择的主要线索,而示范词本身的空间指代线索作用相对较弱。总的来说,空间示范词(实验 1 和 2)和凝视(实验 2)对参照物注意力的影响在与指向相结合时会增强,无论是针对远端位置还是近端位置。这些结果有助于说明为什么空间指代交流通常是多模态的,在空间指代行为中,各个模态发挥着不同的交流功能。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信