"Scheduling Is Everything": A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Job and Schedule Satisfaction of Staff Nurses and Nurse Managers.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Amy Witkoski Stimpfel, Kathryn Leep-Lazar, Maile Mercer, Kathleen DeMarco
{"title":"\"Scheduling Is Everything\": A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Job and Schedule Satisfaction of Staff Nurses and Nurse Managers.","authors":"Amy Witkoski Stimpfel, Kathryn Leep-Lazar, Maile Mercer, Kathleen DeMarco","doi":"10.1177/01939459251330280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shift work and scheduling are major contributors to occupational stress for nurses, leading to job dissatisfaction and risk of turnover. Nurse scheduling processes are complex, as they are dynamically linked to nurse staffing and patient demand.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to describe barriers and facilitators influencing job and scheduling satisfaction among staff nurses and nurse managers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a qualitative descriptive design. The sampling frame included staff nurses and nurse managers employed at an urban academic medical center. Participants (N = 16) completed individual semi-structured Zoom interviews from August 2023 to February 2024, which were audio recorded and transcribed. Data were analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overarching theme identified was \"Scheduling is everything,\" reflecting the importance of scheduling for nurses' satisfaction in and outside of work. Both staff nurses and managers identified tensions between scheduling for patient care needs (e.g., adequate staffing) and scheduling to optimize staff needs (e.g., health, sleep). They also identified staffing shortfalls as a contributor to these scheduling tensions. Staff nurses reported that scheduling challenges compromised their health and well-being, caused work-family conflict, and influenced turnover intentions. Facilitators of scheduling satisfaction included scheduling flexibility, autonomy, and equity. Participants also provided pragmatic ideas for improving scheduling processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study explored perspectives on job and scheduling satisfaction through the lens of both staff and managers. Scheduling challenges contribute to nurses' job dissatisfaction and turnover intentions. By increasing scheduling flexibility, equity, and integrating nurse-led innovations into the scheduling process, healthcare organizations can potentially increase nurse retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":49365,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"1939459251330280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459251330280","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shift work and scheduling are major contributors to occupational stress for nurses, leading to job dissatisfaction and risk of turnover. Nurse scheduling processes are complex, as they are dynamically linked to nurse staffing and patient demand.

Objective: This study sought to describe barriers and facilitators influencing job and scheduling satisfaction among staff nurses and nurse managers.

Methods: We used a qualitative descriptive design. The sampling frame included staff nurses and nurse managers employed at an urban academic medical center. Participants (N = 16) completed individual semi-structured Zoom interviews from August 2023 to February 2024, which were audio recorded and transcribed. Data were analyzed using content analysis.

Results: The overarching theme identified was "Scheduling is everything," reflecting the importance of scheduling for nurses' satisfaction in and outside of work. Both staff nurses and managers identified tensions between scheduling for patient care needs (e.g., adequate staffing) and scheduling to optimize staff needs (e.g., health, sleep). They also identified staffing shortfalls as a contributor to these scheduling tensions. Staff nurses reported that scheduling challenges compromised their health and well-being, caused work-family conflict, and influenced turnover intentions. Facilitators of scheduling satisfaction included scheduling flexibility, autonomy, and equity. Participants also provided pragmatic ideas for improving scheduling processes.

Conclusions: Our study explored perspectives on job and scheduling satisfaction through the lens of both staff and managers. Scheduling challenges contribute to nurses' job dissatisfaction and turnover intentions. By increasing scheduling flexibility, equity, and integrating nurse-led innovations into the scheduling process, healthcare organizations can potentially increase nurse retention.

背景:轮班工作和排班是造成护士职业压力的主要因素,会导致工作不满意和离职风险。护士的排班过程非常复杂,因为它们与护士人手和患者需求动态相关:本研究试图描述影响护士和护士管理人员对工作和排班满意度的障碍和促进因素:我们采用了定性描述设计。抽样范围包括受雇于一家城市学术医疗中心的护士和护士经理。参与者(N = 16)在 2023 年 8 月至 2024 年 2 月期间完成了个人半结构化 Zoom 访谈,并进行了录音和转录。采用内容分析法对数据进行了分析:总的主题是 "日程安排就是一切",反映了日程安排对护士工作内外满意度的重要性。护士长和管理人员都发现,为满足患者护理需求(如充足的人员)而安排工作与为优化员工需求(如健康、睡眠)而安排工作之间存在矛盾。他们还指出,人手不足也是造成排班紧张的原因之一。员工护士报告说,排班方面的挑战损害了他们的健康和福祉,造成了工作与家庭的冲突,并影响了离职意向。促进排班满意度的因素包括排班的灵活性、自主性和公平性。参与者还提出了改进排班流程的务实想法:我们的研究从员工和管理人员的角度探讨了工作和排班满意度。排班方面的挑战导致了护士对工作的不满和离职意向。通过提高排班的灵活性和公平性,并将护士主导的创新融入排班流程,医疗机构有可能提高护士的留任率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Western Journal of Nursing Research (WJNR) is a widely read and respected peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year providing an innovative forum for nurse researchers, students, and clinical practitioners to participate in ongoing scholarly dialogue. WJNR publishes research reports, systematic reviews, methodology papers, and invited special papers. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信