A potential mechanism for tau protein modulating in schizophrenia with transcranial direct current stimulation intervention: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Bioimpacts Pub Date : 2024-07-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.34172/bi.30274
Ali Reza Shafiee-Kandjani, Farnaz Chalabianloo, Sara Farhang, Dariush Shanehbandi, Behzad Shalchi
{"title":"A potential mechanism for tau protein modulating in schizophrenia with transcranial direct current stimulation intervention: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ali Reza Shafiee-Kandjani, Farnaz Chalabianloo, Sara Farhang, Dariush Shanehbandi, Behzad Shalchi","doi":"10.34172/bi.30274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Schizophrenia involves cognitive deficits, including working memory impairments. Researches indicate tau protein abnormalities may contribute to cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. While transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) shows promise in improving cognitive function, its effects on tau protein and working memory in schizophrenia remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty participants were randomly assigned to receive either tDCS or sham treatment in this randomized clinical trial. The tDCS group received anodal stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 20 minutes, while the sham group received a placebo. Serum tau levels and working memory were assessed before and after using ELISA and the digit span task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the tDCS group had a significantly higher increase in phosphorylated tau protein serum levels compared to the sham group (5.53 ± 3.67 vs. 1.49 ± 3.90, <i>P</i> < 0.05). There was no significant mean change difference in serum levels of total tau protein between the groups. Females displayed higher increase in both total tau (1.88 ± 0.66 vs. 1.43 ± 0.80, <i>P</i> = 0.664) and p-tau levels (4.92 ± 0.88 vs. 2.11 ± 0.64, <i>P </i>= 0.014). The tDCS group also showed significantly higher improvement in working memory than the sham group (<i>P </i>< 0.05). Correlations between tau changes and memory enhancements approached significance (r<sub>(total tau)</sub> = 0.30; <i>P </i>= 0.051, r<sub>(p-tau)</sub> = 0.27; <i>P </i>= 0.063).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings reveal the tDCS impact on tau markers, shedding light on the disorder's molecular pathways and sex influences. Enhanced memory, linked to tau changes, suggests its potential as a treatment indicator.</p>","PeriodicalId":48614,"journal":{"name":"Bioimpacts","volume":"15 ","pages":"30274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioimpacts","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/bi.30274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Schizophrenia involves cognitive deficits, including working memory impairments. Researches indicate tau protein abnormalities may contribute to cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. While transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) shows promise in improving cognitive function, its effects on tau protein and working memory in schizophrenia remain unclear.

Methods: Forty participants were randomly assigned to receive either tDCS or sham treatment in this randomized clinical trial. The tDCS group received anodal stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 20 minutes, while the sham group received a placebo. Serum tau levels and working memory were assessed before and after using ELISA and the digit span task.

Results: The results showed that the tDCS group had a significantly higher increase in phosphorylated tau protein serum levels compared to the sham group (5.53 ± 3.67 vs. 1.49 ± 3.90, P < 0.05). There was no significant mean change difference in serum levels of total tau protein between the groups. Females displayed higher increase in both total tau (1.88 ± 0.66 vs. 1.43 ± 0.80, P = 0.664) and p-tau levels (4.92 ± 0.88 vs. 2.11 ± 0.64, P = 0.014). The tDCS group also showed significantly higher improvement in working memory than the sham group (P < 0.05). Correlations between tau changes and memory enhancements approached significance (r(total tau) = 0.30; P = 0.051, r(p-tau) = 0.27; P = 0.063).

Conclusion: These findings reveal the tDCS impact on tau markers, shedding light on the disorder's molecular pathways and sex influences. Enhanced memory, linked to tau changes, suggests its potential as a treatment indicator.

经颅直流电刺激干预对精神分裂症中tau蛋白调节的潜在机制:一项随机对照试验。
精神分裂症涉及认知缺陷,包括工作记忆障碍。研究表明,tau蛋白异常可能导致精神分裂症患者的认知功能障碍。虽然经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)有望改善认知功能,但其对精神分裂症患者tau蛋白和工作记忆的影响尚不清楚。方法:在这个随机临床试验中,40名参与者被随机分配接受tDCS或假治疗。tDCS组在左背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)上进行20分钟的阳极刺激,而假手术组则接受安慰剂。使用ELISA和数字广度任务前后测定血清tau水平和工作记忆。结果:tDCS组血清磷酸化tau蛋白水平(5.53±3.67比1.49±3.90,P P = 0.664)和P -tau蛋白水平(4.92±0.88比2.11±0.64,P = 0.014)均显著高于sham组(P = 0.664)。tDCS组在工作记忆方面的改善也显著高于假手术组(P (total tau) = 0.30;P = 0.051, r(P -tau) = 0.27;p = 0.063)。结论:这些发现揭示了tDCS对tau标志物的影响,揭示了该疾病的分子途径和性别影响。记忆力的增强与tau蛋白的变化有关,这表明它有可能成为一种治疗指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioimpacts
Bioimpacts Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
36
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: BioImpacts (BI) is a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary international journal, covering original research articles, reviews, commentaries, hypotheses, methodologies, and visions/reflections dealing with all aspects of biological and biomedical researches at molecular, cellular, functional and translational dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信