A meta-analysis of students’ academic learning losses over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Andrea S. Wisenöcker , Christoph Helm , Cornelia S. Große , Nicolas Hübner , Steffen Zitzmann
{"title":"A meta-analysis of students’ academic learning losses over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Andrea S. Wisenöcker ,&nbsp;Christoph Helm ,&nbsp;Cornelia S. Große ,&nbsp;Nicolas Hübner ,&nbsp;Steffen Zitzmann","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In spring 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to a disruption of students’ education around the world. School closures led to a shift from in-person learning at school to remote learning, with changes in education persisting over the following years.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>We conducted a meta-analysis to determine if the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with learning losses for school students and to identify potential moderators. We examined learning losses during the pandemic (April 2020–June 2022) and focused on learning losses at different timepoints.</div></div><div><h3>Sample(s)</h3><div>763 effect sizes from 103 studies conducted in 45 different countries were included in our meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>After an extensive, AI-supported literature search, relevant information from the primary studies was coded. Effect sizes were transformed into Cohen's <em>d</em>. An average effect size was estimated and moderator analyses were conducted for school level, learning domain, country's Human Development Index level, publication type, and study quality. Additionally, overall changes in learning losses were examined in more detail, including a moderator analysis for timepoint of data collection during the pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our results showed average learning losses of Cohen's <em>d</em> = −0.20, <em>SE</em> = 0.04, <em>p</em> &lt; .001. Learning domain was the only statistically significant moderator with learning losses being largest in mathematics. The most pronounced learning losses occurred shortly after the onset of the pandemic, but significant learning losses were observed at the majority of the included timepoints.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Learning losses were observed more than two years into the pandemic, highlighting the need to ensure long-term recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 102111"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000350","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In spring 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to a disruption of students’ education around the world. School closures led to a shift from in-person learning at school to remote learning, with changes in education persisting over the following years.

Aims

We conducted a meta-analysis to determine if the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with learning losses for school students and to identify potential moderators. We examined learning losses during the pandemic (April 2020–June 2022) and focused on learning losses at different timepoints.

Sample(s)

763 effect sizes from 103 studies conducted in 45 different countries were included in our meta-analysis.

Methods

After an extensive, AI-supported literature search, relevant information from the primary studies was coded. Effect sizes were transformed into Cohen's d. An average effect size was estimated and moderator analyses were conducted for school level, learning domain, country's Human Development Index level, publication type, and study quality. Additionally, overall changes in learning losses were examined in more detail, including a moderator analysis for timepoint of data collection during the pandemic.

Results

Our results showed average learning losses of Cohen's d = −0.20, SE = 0.04, p < .001. Learning domain was the only statistically significant moderator with learning losses being largest in mathematics. The most pronounced learning losses occurred shortly after the onset of the pandemic, but significant learning losses were observed at the majority of the included timepoints.

Conclusions

Learning losses were observed more than two years into the pandemic, highlighting the need to ensure long-term recovery.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信