Feedback Perceived by General Surgery Residents: What is the Influence of Program Characteristics?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Ramsha Akhund MD , Daniela D. Muñoz Wilson MA , M. Chandler McLeod PhD, MS , Andrew T. Jones PhD , George Sarosi MD , Karen Brasel MD, MPH , Rebecca M. Minter MD , John Mellinger MD , Jo Buyske MD , Brenessa Lindeman MD, MEHP
{"title":"Feedback Perceived by General Surgery Residents: What is the Influence of Program Characteristics?","authors":"Ramsha Akhund MD ,&nbsp;Daniela D. Muñoz Wilson MA ,&nbsp;M. Chandler McLeod PhD, MS ,&nbsp;Andrew T. Jones PhD ,&nbsp;George Sarosi MD ,&nbsp;Karen Brasel MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Rebecca M. Minter MD ,&nbsp;John Mellinger MD ,&nbsp;Jo Buyske MD ,&nbsp;Brenessa Lindeman MD, MEHP","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Studies investigating residents’ perceptions of feedback received are sparse. We explored general surgery residents’ (GSR) perceptions of feedback based on program characteristics, such as region, size, and type in a national sample.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An optional survey following the American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam (ABSITE) was administered in January 2023 querying feedback quality, amount, and timeliness on GSRs’ self-identified best and worst rotations, overall feedback satisfaction, and frequency of feedback. Program characteristics included geographic location, program type, and size grouped into quartiles(Q). Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed with Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and ordinal regression, as appropriate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Responses from 9854 individuals representing 348 programs were received. Most respondents (n = 3259) and programs (n = 110) were from the Northeast (NE). While most respondents trained at University-based programs (n = 4961), most programs were University-affiliated (n = 130). Mean overall feedback satisfaction decreased as program size increased (7.4, 7.3, 7.2, and 6.9 in Q1-4, respectively). On ordinal regression, residents from Q4 had 0.7x lower odds of overall satisfaction compared to Q1 (p &lt; 0.05). Residents from University-affiliated, Independent academic centers, and those from Southeast, had 1.2x higher odds of overall feedback satisfaction compared to University-based and Northeast (p &lt; 0.05). Multivariable analysis of best rotation feedback showed 1.3-1.5x higher odds of satisfaction in regions outside the Northeast (NE) (p &lt; 0.05 for all). Residents from the largest programs (Q4) had 0.8x lower odds of satisfaction compared to those from the smallest (Q1). Multivariable analysis of intra-operative feedback showed Midwest residents and those in Q3 and Q4 had 0.8, 0.8, and 0.7x lower odds of reporting positive feedback, respectively, compared to reference (p &lt; 0.05 for all).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Program characteristics like location, type, and size affect feedback satisfaction, but no consistent trends were found in their interactions. This can guide program leaders in raising awareness and advocating for feedback improvements, with further research needed to understand underlying factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 6","pages":"Article 103508"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425000881","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Studies investigating residents’ perceptions of feedback received are sparse. We explored general surgery residents’ (GSR) perceptions of feedback based on program characteristics, such as region, size, and type in a national sample.

Methods

An optional survey following the American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam (ABSITE) was administered in January 2023 querying feedback quality, amount, and timeliness on GSRs’ self-identified best and worst rotations, overall feedback satisfaction, and frequency of feedback. Program characteristics included geographic location, program type, and size grouped into quartiles(Q). Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed with Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and ordinal regression, as appropriate.

Results

Responses from 9854 individuals representing 348 programs were received. Most respondents (n = 3259) and programs (n = 110) were from the Northeast (NE). While most respondents trained at University-based programs (n = 4961), most programs were University-affiliated (n = 130). Mean overall feedback satisfaction decreased as program size increased (7.4, 7.3, 7.2, and 6.9 in Q1-4, respectively). On ordinal regression, residents from Q4 had 0.7x lower odds of overall satisfaction compared to Q1 (p < 0.05). Residents from University-affiliated, Independent academic centers, and those from Southeast, had 1.2x higher odds of overall feedback satisfaction compared to University-based and Northeast (p < 0.05). Multivariable analysis of best rotation feedback showed 1.3-1.5x higher odds of satisfaction in regions outside the Northeast (NE) (p < 0.05 for all). Residents from the largest programs (Q4) had 0.8x lower odds of satisfaction compared to those from the smallest (Q1). Multivariable analysis of intra-operative feedback showed Midwest residents and those in Q3 and Q4 had 0.8, 0.8, and 0.7x lower odds of reporting positive feedback, respectively, compared to reference (p < 0.05 for all).

Conclusion

Program characteristics like location, type, and size affect feedback satisfaction, but no consistent trends were found in their interactions. This can guide program leaders in raising awareness and advocating for feedback improvements, with further research needed to understand underlying factors.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信