{"title":"Assessing direct CPT-based methods for predicting pile base resistance using coupled DEM-FDM simulations","authors":"Fei Chai , Bo Liu , Jianfeng Xue , Kevin Duffy","doi":"10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study utilises parallel discrete element method (DEM) simulations of cone penetration tests (CPTs) and pile load tests to investigate the application of direct CPT-based methods for predicting the base capacity of bored piles in layered soils. To reduce boundary effects, a coupled DEM-finite difference method (FDM) model is constructed to simulate pile load tests. The study focuses on the scale effect of pile diameter on the correction factor <em>α</em><sub>b</sub> and the effectiveness of existing <em>q</em><sub>c</sub> averaging methods in layered soils. Two pile diameters and three soil layering conditions, featuring a single silt layer interbedded within sand at varying depths, are considered in the simulations. Results show that both soil layering and pile displacement influence the scale effect. At small settlements (<em>s</em>) up to 0.3 times the pile diameter (<em>D</em>), the scale effect is insignificant, except when a soft layer is directly above the pile tip. At larger settlements, particularly when <em>s</em> > 0.5<em>D</em>, piles with smaller diameters show more pronounced reductions in base resistance due to a weak layer closely beneath the tip. Among the four methods evaluated, the BD-18 <em>q</em><sub>c</sub> averaging method produces more consistent <em>α</em><sub>b</sub> values across various soil profiles and pile diameters. Microscopic analysis reveals that soils above the tip contribute less to the pile base resistance at <em>s</em>/<em>D</em> = 0.1 than to the cone tip resistance. Additionally, the strength mobilisation levels of soils in most soil layering conditions appear similar at <em>s</em>/<em>D</em> = 0.1, supporting the proposal of a constant <em>α</em><sub>b</sub> value in direct CPT-based methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55217,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Geotechnics","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 107230"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X2500179X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study utilises parallel discrete element method (DEM) simulations of cone penetration tests (CPTs) and pile load tests to investigate the application of direct CPT-based methods for predicting the base capacity of bored piles in layered soils. To reduce boundary effects, a coupled DEM-finite difference method (FDM) model is constructed to simulate pile load tests. The study focuses on the scale effect of pile diameter on the correction factor αb and the effectiveness of existing qc averaging methods in layered soils. Two pile diameters and three soil layering conditions, featuring a single silt layer interbedded within sand at varying depths, are considered in the simulations. Results show that both soil layering and pile displacement influence the scale effect. At small settlements (s) up to 0.3 times the pile diameter (D), the scale effect is insignificant, except when a soft layer is directly above the pile tip. At larger settlements, particularly when s > 0.5D, piles with smaller diameters show more pronounced reductions in base resistance due to a weak layer closely beneath the tip. Among the four methods evaluated, the BD-18 qc averaging method produces more consistent αb values across various soil profiles and pile diameters. Microscopic analysis reveals that soils above the tip contribute less to the pile base resistance at s/D = 0.1 than to the cone tip resistance. Additionally, the strength mobilisation levels of soils in most soil layering conditions appear similar at s/D = 0.1, supporting the proposal of a constant αb value in direct CPT-based methods.
期刊介绍:
The use of computers is firmly established in geotechnical engineering and continues to grow rapidly in both engineering practice and academe. The development of advanced numerical techniques and constitutive modeling, in conjunction with rapid developments in computer hardware, enables problems to be tackled that were unthinkable even a few years ago. Computers and Geotechnics provides an up-to-date reference for engineers and researchers engaged in computer aided analysis and research in geotechnical engineering. The journal is intended for an expeditious dissemination of advanced computer applications across a broad range of geotechnical topics. Contributions on advances in numerical algorithms, computer implementation of new constitutive models and probabilistic methods are especially encouraged.