Dong Xing, Xufeng Gao, Huan Chen, Jianze Zhang, Madison E. Edwards, Chiyu Liang, Chongqin Zhu, Yifan Meng, Richard N. Zare, Yu Xia, Xinxing Zhang
{"title":"Challenges in Detecting Hydroxyl Radicals Generated in Water Droplets with Mass Spectrometry","authors":"Dong Xing, Xufeng Gao, Huan Chen, Jianze Zhang, Madison E. Edwards, Chiyu Liang, Chongqin Zhu, Yifan Meng, Richard N. Zare, Yu Xia, Xinxing Zhang","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.5c00386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water is sprayed into the air using three distinct methods: (1) nanoelectrospray ionization, (2) a vibrating membrane nebulizer, and (3) a pneumatic nebulizer. The resulting droplets are analyzed by three different mass analyzers: (a) a linear ion trap mass analyzer on an <i>LTQ-XL</i> mass spectrometer, (b) the <i>Velos Pro</i> dual-pressure linear ion trap mass analyzer on an <i>Orbitrap Elite</i> mass spectrometer, and (c) the Orbitrap mass analyzer on the same <i>Orbitrap Elite</i> system. We searched for hydroxyl radical adducts with hydronium ions (OH•–H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup>) or reaction products with caffeine dissolved in water and with melatonin dissolved in water. These experiments were repeated in several different laboratories, and all results were the same. The oxidation products of caffeine and melatonin were not detected when using the Orbitrap mass analyzer having a much longer holding time in the ion trap (500 ms) but could be observed with reduced intensity at much shorter holding times (<10 ms). The signal of OH•–H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup> was also significantly reduced when using the <i>Velos Pro</i> dual-pressure linear ion trap mass analyzer. These results suggest that ion signals from fragile radicals may be diminished or lost depending on the mass detection system and operating conditions employed, and there may be a risk of obtaining spurious results when using an Orbitrap mass spectrometer.","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c00386","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Water is sprayed into the air using three distinct methods: (1) nanoelectrospray ionization, (2) a vibrating membrane nebulizer, and (3) a pneumatic nebulizer. The resulting droplets are analyzed by three different mass analyzers: (a) a linear ion trap mass analyzer on an LTQ-XL mass spectrometer, (b) the Velos Pro dual-pressure linear ion trap mass analyzer on an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer, and (c) the Orbitrap mass analyzer on the same Orbitrap Elite system. We searched for hydroxyl radical adducts with hydronium ions (OH•–H3O+) or reaction products with caffeine dissolved in water and with melatonin dissolved in water. These experiments were repeated in several different laboratories, and all results were the same. The oxidation products of caffeine and melatonin were not detected when using the Orbitrap mass analyzer having a much longer holding time in the ion trap (500 ms) but could be observed with reduced intensity at much shorter holding times (<10 ms). The signal of OH•–H3O+ was also significantly reduced when using the Velos Pro dual-pressure linear ion trap mass analyzer. These results suggest that ion signals from fragile radicals may be diminished or lost depending on the mass detection system and operating conditions employed, and there may be a risk of obtaining spurious results when using an Orbitrap mass spectrometer.
期刊介绍:
Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.