Hardiyanti Pratiwi, Suherman, Hasruddin, Muhammad Ridha
{"title":"Between Shortcut and Ethics: Navigating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing Among Indonesian Doctoral Students","authors":"Hardiyanti Pratiwi, Suherman, Hasruddin, Muhammad Ridha","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool in academic writing, leveraging advanced algorithms and natural language processing to significantly improve efficiency, quality and productivity. This study investigates the use of AI tools among Indonesian doctoral students, with a particular focus on ethical standards and their impact on critical thinking. Adopting a phenomenological approach, the research involved 81 participants who provided data through open-ended questionnaires, which were analysed thematically. The findings reveal that AI tools—such as ChatGPT, Deepl, Zotero, Scite AI, Connected Papers and Humata—are extensively used for generating ideas, brainstorming, data analysis, drafting, grammar correction, translation and literature management. While students acknowledge the advantages of AI in enhancing speed and efficiency, they express concerns regarding its ethical implications and potential impact on critical thinking. Key ethical issues include maintaining academic integrity, ensuring manual verification of AI-generated content and avoiding overreliance. The study underscores that, although AI facilitates idea generation and technical tasks, it may undermine critical thinking and analytical skills. To uphold ethical standards and preserve intellectual rigour, the study advocates for a balanced use of AI, positioning it as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, critical scholarly practices.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool in academic writing, leveraging advanced algorithms and natural language processing to significantly improve efficiency, quality and productivity. This study investigates the use of AI tools among Indonesian doctoral students, with a particular focus on ethical standards and their impact on critical thinking. Adopting a phenomenological approach, the research involved 81 participants who provided data through open-ended questionnaires, which were analysed thematically. The findings reveal that AI tools—such as ChatGPT, Deepl, Zotero, Scite AI, Connected Papers and Humata—are extensively used for generating ideas, brainstorming, data analysis, drafting, grammar correction, translation and literature management. While students acknowledge the advantages of AI in enhancing speed and efficiency, they express concerns regarding its ethical implications and potential impact on critical thinking. Key ethical issues include maintaining academic integrity, ensuring manual verification of AI-generated content and avoiding overreliance. The study underscores that, although AI facilitates idea generation and technical tasks, it may undermine critical thinking and analytical skills. To uphold ethical standards and preserve intellectual rigour, the study advocates for a balanced use of AI, positioning it as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, critical scholarly practices.
期刊介绍:
The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.