A systematic review of modern measures for capturing children’s ethnic and racial attitudes, stereotypes, and discrimination

IF 5.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Eren Fukuda , Katharine E. Scott , Katherine L. Swerbenski , Nicole Huth , Kierin C. Barnett , Natalie Sarmiento , Madeline A. Henkel , Kristin Shutts
{"title":"A systematic review of modern measures for capturing children’s ethnic and racial attitudes, stereotypes, and discrimination","authors":"Eren Fukuda ,&nbsp;Katharine E. Scott ,&nbsp;Katherine L. Swerbenski ,&nbsp;Nicole Huth ,&nbsp;Kierin C. Barnett ,&nbsp;Natalie Sarmiento ,&nbsp;Madeline A. Henkel ,&nbsp;Kristin Shutts","doi":"10.1016/j.dr.2025.101189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, there have been accelerated efforts among developmental scientists to understand and address children’s ethnic and racial attitudes, stereotypes, and discrimination. For such efforts, using high-quality and context-appropriate measures is critical. However, focused discussions and investigations of measures for capturing children’s ethnic and racial attitudes, stereotypes, and discrimination are scant. Accordingly, we conducted a systematic review of 1,001 measures that were used in 403 journal articles published between 2010 and 2022. Our review was guided by four questions: (1) What types of measures of children’s ethnic and racial attitudes, stereotypes, and discrimination are being used by researchers?; (2) How do measures represent target groups?; (3) In which geographic and demographic contexts are measures being used?; and (4) What evidence do we have about some of the psychometric properties of commonly used scales/tasks? In seeking answers to these questions, we found both strengths and problems with our field’s toolkit of measures. Taken together, our review provides an overview of modern measures for capturing children’s ethnic and racial attitudes, stereotypes, and discrimination; offers initial insights about the characteristics and psychometric properties of those measures; and makes recommendations for future efforts in the field. We argue that measurement evaluation is a fertile avenue for future work in our field and that widespread discussions about measurement are necessary to advance the science of how children feel, think about, and behave toward members of different social groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48214,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Review","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101189"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229725000048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there have been accelerated efforts among developmental scientists to understand and address children’s ethnic and racial attitudes, stereotypes, and discrimination. For such efforts, using high-quality and context-appropriate measures is critical. However, focused discussions and investigations of measures for capturing children’s ethnic and racial attitudes, stereotypes, and discrimination are scant. Accordingly, we conducted a systematic review of 1,001 measures that were used in 403 journal articles published between 2010 and 2022. Our review was guided by four questions: (1) What types of measures of children’s ethnic and racial attitudes, stereotypes, and discrimination are being used by researchers?; (2) How do measures represent target groups?; (3) In which geographic and demographic contexts are measures being used?; and (4) What evidence do we have about some of the psychometric properties of commonly used scales/tasks? In seeking answers to these questions, we found both strengths and problems with our field’s toolkit of measures. Taken together, our review provides an overview of modern measures for capturing children’s ethnic and racial attitudes, stereotypes, and discrimination; offers initial insights about the characteristics and psychometric properties of those measures; and makes recommendations for future efforts in the field. We argue that measurement evaluation is a fertile avenue for future work in our field and that widespread discussions about measurement are necessary to advance the science of how children feel, think about, and behave toward members of different social groups.
近年来,发展科学家们加快了了解和解决儿童的民族和种族态度、成见和歧视问题的步伐。对于这些工作而言,使用高质量且适合具体情况的测量方法至关重要。然而,关于捕捉儿童民族和种族态度、刻板印象和歧视的测量方法的集中讨论和调查却很少。因此,我们对 2010 年至 2022 年间发表的 403 篇期刊论文中使用的 1001 种测量方法进行了系统性回顾。我们的综述以四个问题为指导:(1) 研究人员正在使用哪些类型的儿童民族和种族态度、刻板印象和歧视测量方法? (2) 测量方法如何代表目标群体? (3) 测量方法在哪些地理和人口背景下使用? (4) 我们有哪些证据表明常用量表/任务的心理测量特性?在寻求这些问题的答案时,我们发现我们领域的测量工具包既有优势也有问题。总之,我们的综述概述了捕捉儿童民族和种族态度、刻板印象和歧视的现代测量方法;提供了关于这些测量方法的特点和心理测量特性的初步见解;并为该领域未来的工作提出了建议。我们认为,测量评估是我们这个领域未来工作的一个肥沃途径,而广泛讨论测量问题对于推进儿童如何感受、思考和对待不同社会群体成员的科学研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Developmental Review
Developmental Review PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Presenting research that bears on important conceptual issues in developmental psychology, Developmental Review: Perspectives in Behavior and Cognition provides child and developmental, child clinical, and educational psychologists with authoritative articles that reflect current thinking and cover significant scientific developments. The journal emphasizes human developmental processes and gives particular attention to issues relevant to child developmental psychology. The research concerns issues with important implications for the fields of pediatrics, psychiatry, and education, and increases the understanding of socialization processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信