Maple Syrup Adulteration: Fluorescence Fingerprints as a Source of Information for Enhanced Detection.

M Singh, M Zhang, M Espinal-Ruiz, S Rathnayake, J Xue, J Shi, X Liu, R Hanner, M G Corradini
{"title":"Maple Syrup Adulteration: Fluorescence Fingerprints as a Source of Information for Enhanced Detection.","authors":"M Singh, M Zhang, M Espinal-Ruiz, S Rathnayake, J Xue, J Shi, X Liu, R Hanner, M G Corradini","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maple syrup is often adulterated by dilution or substitution with other syrups due to its high demand and price. Fingerprinting techniques, e.g., DNA barcoding, detect adulteration in other foods. However, extensive processing during the transformation of sap into syrup degrades the genetic material, lowering the efficacy of this approach. In contrast, fluorescence fingerprints (EEMs) rely on a sample's intrinsic fluorophores to provide valuable information for detecting adulteration.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the capabilities and limitations of EEMs to scout for adulteration markers and discriminate between pure and adulterated maple syrup samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EEMs of pure amber and dark maple syrups and admixtures with common adulterants (beet, corn, and rice syrups at 1-50%) were obtained using a spectrophotometer (λex=250-500 nm, and λem=280-650 nm). The major components of the EEMs were identified using PARAFAC and confirmed by LC-MS/MS. The ratio of intensities of the two most prevalent EEM features was calculated. An artificial neural network (ANN) and a convolutional neural network (CNN) were developed to analyze the EEMs based on emissions at two selected excitation wavelengths and the full EEM image, respectively, to discriminate presence and level of adulteration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EEMs of the samples allowed identifying valuable discriminatory information. The efficacy of the ratio of the emission intensities at λem=350 and 425 (I425/I350) when λex= 290 nm to identify potential fraud (70-86% correct identifications) depended on the adulterant. This ratio was particularly effective for beet syrup adulteration, even at concentrations <2%. Applying machine learning algorithms improved detection for all adulterants. ANN correctly identified adulteration type and level (90 & 82%). The CNN approach accurately classified 75-99% of adulterated syrups but required additional computational power and denser data sets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study aids in providing a quick, non-destructive and green monitoring tool for maple syrup adulteration based on its intrinsic fluorophores.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Maple syrup is often adulterated with other syrups due to high demand and price. DNA barcoding is ineffective in detecting maple syrup adulteration due to DNA degradation. Fluorescence fingerprints or EEMs allow scouting for discriminatory markers in maple syrup. Machine learning algorithms (ANN and CNN) applied to EEM data can aid detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maple syrup is often adulterated by dilution or substitution with other syrups due to its high demand and price. Fingerprinting techniques, e.g., DNA barcoding, detect adulteration in other foods. However, extensive processing during the transformation of sap into syrup degrades the genetic material, lowering the efficacy of this approach. In contrast, fluorescence fingerprints (EEMs) rely on a sample's intrinsic fluorophores to provide valuable information for detecting adulteration.

Objective: This study evaluates the capabilities and limitations of EEMs to scout for adulteration markers and discriminate between pure and adulterated maple syrup samples.

Methods: EEMs of pure amber and dark maple syrups and admixtures with common adulterants (beet, corn, and rice syrups at 1-50%) were obtained using a spectrophotometer (λex=250-500 nm, and λem=280-650 nm). The major components of the EEMs were identified using PARAFAC and confirmed by LC-MS/MS. The ratio of intensities of the two most prevalent EEM features was calculated. An artificial neural network (ANN) and a convolutional neural network (CNN) were developed to analyze the EEMs based on emissions at two selected excitation wavelengths and the full EEM image, respectively, to discriminate presence and level of adulteration.

Results: EEMs of the samples allowed identifying valuable discriminatory information. The efficacy of the ratio of the emission intensities at λem=350 and 425 (I425/I350) when λex= 290 nm to identify potential fraud (70-86% correct identifications) depended on the adulterant. This ratio was particularly effective for beet syrup adulteration, even at concentrations <2%. Applying machine learning algorithms improved detection for all adulterants. ANN correctly identified adulteration type and level (90 & 82%). The CNN approach accurately classified 75-99% of adulterated syrups but required additional computational power and denser data sets.

Conclusion: This study aids in providing a quick, non-destructive and green monitoring tool for maple syrup adulteration based on its intrinsic fluorophores.

Highlights: Maple syrup is often adulterated with other syrups due to high demand and price. DNA barcoding is ineffective in detecting maple syrup adulteration due to DNA degradation. Fluorescence fingerprints or EEMs allow scouting for discriminatory markers in maple syrup. Machine learning algorithms (ANN and CNN) applied to EEM data can aid detection.

背景:由于需求量大、价格高,枫糖浆经常被稀释或用其他糖浆替代而掺假。指纹识别技术(如 DNA 条形码)可检测其他食品中的掺假情况。然而,在树液转化为糖浆的过程中,大量的加工过程会使遗传物质降解,从而降低了这种方法的有效性。与此相反,荧光指纹(EEM)依靠样品固有的荧光团来提供检测掺假的宝贵信息:本研究评估了 EEM 在检测掺假标记和区分纯枫糖浆与掺假枫糖浆样品方面的能力和局限性:使用分光光度计(λex=250-500 nm,λem=280-650 nm)获得纯琥珀色和深色枫糖浆以及掺有常见掺假物(甜菜、玉米和大米糖浆,含量为 1-50%)的 EEMs。使用 PARAFAC 对 EEMs 的主要成分进行了鉴定,并通过 LC-MS/MS 进行了确认。计算了两种最普遍的 EEM 特征的强度比。开发了一个人工神经网络(ANN)和一个卷积神经网络(CNN),分别根据两个选定激发波长的发射和完整的 EEM 图像来分析 EEMs,以鉴别掺假的存在和程度:结果:样品的 EEM 可识别有价值的鉴别信息。λex=290纳米时,λem=350和425处的发射强度比值(I425/I350)对识别潜在欺诈行为的功效(70-86%的识别正确率)取决于掺假物质。该比率对甜菜糖浆掺假特别有效,即使在浓度为 结论时也是如此:这项研究有助于根据枫糖浆固有的荧光团,为枫糖浆掺假提供一种快速、无损和绿色的监测工具:亮点:由于需求量大、价格高,枫糖浆经常掺杂其他糖浆。由于 DNA 降解,DNA 条形码无法有效检测枫糖浆掺假。通过荧光指纹或 EEMs 可以检测枫糖浆中的鉴别标记。应用于 EEM 数据的机器学习算法(ANN 和 CNN)可以帮助检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信