Impact of Antibiotic Therapy with Ceftazidime Avibactam vs. Best Available Therapy in Adult Patients with Bacteremia Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales.
Daniel Arboleda, Camilo Buitrago, Erika Paola Vergara, Laura Cristina Nocua-Báez, Carlos Humberto Saavedra, Jorge Alberto Cortés
{"title":"Impact of Antibiotic Therapy with Ceftazidime Avibactam vs. Best Available Therapy in Adult Patients with Bacteremia Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales.","authors":"Daniel Arboleda, Camilo Buitrago, Erika Paola Vergara, Laura Cristina Nocua-Báez, Carlos Humberto Saavedra, Jorge Alberto Cortés","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14030226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infection is associated with a higher mortality rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ceftazidime avibactam (CZA) for treating bacteremia caused by CRE compared to the best available therapy in an area where these microorganisms are endemic. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective cohort study of patients with CRE bacteremia was conducted. We included adults with CRE bacteremia who were treated with CZA or the best available therapy (BAT) for more than 48 h, and the hospitalization time was recorded. The outcomes included death during hospitalization, relapse, and microbiological cure. Confounders were adjusted using propensity score-derived stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). <b>Results</b>: A total of 169 patients with CRE bacteremia were included. About 72.6% of isolates had a class A serin carbapenamase, and 20.4% had metallo-β-lactamase co-production. A total of 107 patients were treated with CZA, 63% in monotherapy and 32% with aztreonam (ATM). Crude mortality during hospitalization was 36 (34.5%) in patients treated with CZA and 21 (33.2%) with BAT. No difference was observed between death rates (HR 0.86: IC 95% 0.40-1.83), microbiological cure (OR 1.31 IC 95% 0.46-3.67), clinical response (OR 1.39 IC 95% 0.35-5.43), acute kidney injury (OR 0.56 IC 95% 0.11-2.80) or relapse (OR 0.99 IC 95% 0.17-5.51) during the hospitalization after the adjustment. <b>Conclusions</b>: Among adult patients with CRE, no differences were observed between treatments with CZA and BAT after adjustment with IPTW.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14030226","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infection is associated with a higher mortality rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ceftazidime avibactam (CZA) for treating bacteremia caused by CRE compared to the best available therapy in an area where these microorganisms are endemic. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with CRE bacteremia was conducted. We included adults with CRE bacteremia who were treated with CZA or the best available therapy (BAT) for more than 48 h, and the hospitalization time was recorded. The outcomes included death during hospitalization, relapse, and microbiological cure. Confounders were adjusted using propensity score-derived stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Results: A total of 169 patients with CRE bacteremia were included. About 72.6% of isolates had a class A serin carbapenamase, and 20.4% had metallo-β-lactamase co-production. A total of 107 patients were treated with CZA, 63% in monotherapy and 32% with aztreonam (ATM). Crude mortality during hospitalization was 36 (34.5%) in patients treated with CZA and 21 (33.2%) with BAT. No difference was observed between death rates (HR 0.86: IC 95% 0.40-1.83), microbiological cure (OR 1.31 IC 95% 0.46-3.67), clinical response (OR 1.39 IC 95% 0.35-5.43), acute kidney injury (OR 0.56 IC 95% 0.11-2.80) or relapse (OR 0.99 IC 95% 0.17-5.51) during the hospitalization after the adjustment. Conclusions: Among adult patients with CRE, no differences were observed between treatments with CZA and BAT after adjustment with IPTW.
背景/目的:碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌(CRE)感染与较高的死亡率相关。本研究的目的是评估头孢他啶阿维巴坦(CZA)治疗由CRE引起的菌血症的效果,并将其与这些微生物地方性流行的地区的最佳治疗方法进行比较。方法:对CRE菌血症患者进行回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了接受CZA或最佳可用疗法(best available therapy, BAT)治疗超过48小时的CRE菌血症成人,并记录住院时间。结果包括住院期间死亡、复发和微生物治愈。使用倾向评分衍生的治疗加权稳定逆概率(IPTW)调整混杂因素。结果:共纳入169例CRE菌血症患者。72.6%的分离株具有a类丝氨酸碳青霉酰胺酶,20.4%的分离株具有金属β-内酰胺酶的共产。107例患者接受CZA治疗,63%采用单药治疗,32%采用氨曲南(ATM)治疗。CZA组住院期间粗死亡率为36例(34.5%),BAT组为21例(33.2%)。调整后住院期间的死亡率(HR 0.86: IC 95% 0.40-1.83)、微生物治愈率(OR 1.31 IC 95% 0.46-3.67)、临床缓解率(OR 1.39 IC 95% 0.35-5.43)、急性肾损伤率(OR 0.56 IC 95% 0.11-2.80)和复发率(OR 0.99 IC 95% 0.17-5.51)无显著差异。结论:在成年CRE患者中,经IPTW调整后,CZA与BAT治疗无差异。
Antibiotics-BaselPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.