Evaluating Bezlotoxumab-Fidaxomicin Combination Therapy in Clostridioides Infection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study from Aichi Prefecture, Japan.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Jun Hirai, Nobuaki Mori, Yuki Hanai, Nobuhiro Asai, Mao Hagihara, Hiroshige Mikamo
{"title":"Evaluating Bezlotoxumab-Fidaxomicin Combination Therapy in Clostridioides Infection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study from Aichi Prefecture, Japan.","authors":"Jun Hirai, Nobuaki Mori, Yuki Hanai, Nobuhiro Asai, Mao Hagihara, Hiroshige Mikamo","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14030228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b><i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) poses a significant healthcare challenge, with recurrence rates reaching 30%, leading to substantial morbidity and costs. Fidaxomicin (FDX) and bezlotoxumab (BEZ) have shown potential in reducing recurrence; however, real-world data on the efficacy of their combination in high-risk CDI patients remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FDX + BEZ compared with FDX alone in CDI patients with recurrence risk factors. <b>Methods:</b> CDI patients with ≥two recurrence risk factors treated with FDX alone or FDX + BEZ were analyzed. Sixteen factors were evaluated as risk factors for recurrent CDI based on findings from previous studies. Patients with FDX treatment duration <10 days or other CDI treatment prior to FDX were excluded. Outcomes included recurrence within 2 months, global and clinical cure rates, and adverse events. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate efficacy. <b>Results:</b> Among 82 patients, the FDX + BEZ group (<i>n</i> = 30) demonstrated significantly higher global (86.7% vs. 65.4%; <i>p</i> < 0.05) and clinical cure rates (90.0% vs. 69.2%; <i>p</i> < 0.05) compared with the FDX-alone group (<i>n</i> = 52), despite more severe cases in the combination group. Recurrence rates were non-significantly lower in the FDX + BEZ group (3.3% vs. 11.5%). Combination therapy also accelerated diarrhea resolution without additional adverse events. Multivariate analysis identified FDX + BEZ as significantly associated with improved clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio 4.167; 95% CI: 1.029-16.885). <b>Conclusions:</b> FDX + BEZ therapy offers superior efficacy and safety in CDI patients with recurrence risk factors, presenting a promising strategy for optimizing CDI management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14030228","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives:Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) poses a significant healthcare challenge, with recurrence rates reaching 30%, leading to substantial morbidity and costs. Fidaxomicin (FDX) and bezlotoxumab (BEZ) have shown potential in reducing recurrence; however, real-world data on the efficacy of their combination in high-risk CDI patients remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FDX + BEZ compared with FDX alone in CDI patients with recurrence risk factors. Methods: CDI patients with ≥two recurrence risk factors treated with FDX alone or FDX + BEZ were analyzed. Sixteen factors were evaluated as risk factors for recurrent CDI based on findings from previous studies. Patients with FDX treatment duration <10 days or other CDI treatment prior to FDX were excluded. Outcomes included recurrence within 2 months, global and clinical cure rates, and adverse events. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate efficacy. Results: Among 82 patients, the FDX + BEZ group (n = 30) demonstrated significantly higher global (86.7% vs. 65.4%; p < 0.05) and clinical cure rates (90.0% vs. 69.2%; p < 0.05) compared with the FDX-alone group (n = 52), despite more severe cases in the combination group. Recurrence rates were non-significantly lower in the FDX + BEZ group (3.3% vs. 11.5%). Combination therapy also accelerated diarrhea resolution without additional adverse events. Multivariate analysis identified FDX + BEZ as significantly associated with improved clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio 4.167; 95% CI: 1.029-16.885). Conclusions: FDX + BEZ therapy offers superior efficacy and safety in CDI patients with recurrence risk factors, presenting a promising strategy for optimizing CDI management.

评估梭菌感染的贝洛妥珠单抗-非达霉素联合疗法:日本爱知县的一项单中心回顾性研究
背景/目的:艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是一个重大的医疗挑战,复发率达到30%,导致大量的发病率和成本。Fidaxomicin (FDX)和bezlotoxumab (BEZ)显示出减少复发的潜力;然而,关于两种药物联合使用对高危CDI患者疗效的实际数据仍然有限。本研究旨在评价FDX + BEZ治疗有复发危险因素的CDI患者与单独FDX治疗的疗效和安全性。方法:对有≥2种复发危险因素的CDI患者分别采用FDX单用或FDX + BEZ治疗。根据以往的研究结果,我们评估了16个因素作为复发性CDI的危险因素。结果:在82例患者中,FDX + BEZ组(n = 30)表现出显著更高的整体(86.7% vs. 65.4%;P < 0.05)和临床治愈率(90.0%∶69.2%;p < 0.05),与单独用药组(n = 52)相比,联合用药组的病例更为严重。FDX + BEZ组复发率无明显降低(3.3% vs. 11.5%)。联合治疗也加速了腹泻的消退,没有额外的不良事件。多因素分析发现,FDX + BEZ与临床治愈率的提高显著相关(校正优势比4.167;95% ci: 1.029-16.885)。结论:FDX + BEZ治疗对有复发危险因素的CDI患者具有较好的疗效和安全性,是优化CDI治疗的一种有前景的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信