An Evaluation of the ASTar Automated Antimicrobial Testing System for Gram-Negative Bacteria in Positive Blood Cultures.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hannah Coulson, Angelo Ivin, Kathryn M Day, Danielle J C Fenwick, Emma C L Marrs, Patrick Mpwilu, John D Perry
{"title":"An Evaluation of the ASTar Automated Antimicrobial Testing System for Gram-Negative Bacteria in Positive Blood Cultures.","authors":"Hannah Coulson, Angelo Ivin, Kathryn M Day, Danielle J C Fenwick, Emma C L Marrs, Patrick Mpwilu, John D Perry","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14030249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Prompt administration of optimal antibiotic therapy is essential in the management of bacteraemia to reduce morbidity and mortality and to facilitate antibiotic stewardship. To identify the most effective therapy, rapid and accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is essential. ASTar is an automated AST system that delivers minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for 23 antimicrobials and is designed for testing Gram-negative bacteria directly from positive blood cultures, with results available after 6 h. <b>Methods</b>: The ASTar system was evaluated with 64 positive blood cultures from patients with bacteraemia and 56 simulated blood cultures inoculated with a range of antibiotic-resistant isolates. The ASTar results for 12 antibiotics commonly used in our hospitals were compared with the results derived from three different methods of disc susceptibility testing and MICs determined by broth microdilution (BMD). <b>Results</b>: For 121 isolates of Gram-negative bacteria, ASTar showed an average essential agreement of 87.2% and an average categorical agreement of 94%, when compared with BMD. Very major errors (false susceptibility) and major errors (false resistance) were associated with 0.9% and 3.4% of results, respectively. The results were at least as accurate as those obtained from EUCAST disc susceptibility methods (both rapid and overnight methods). <b>Conclusions</b>: The ASTar system is an effective method for delivering accurate and rapid (6 h) AST results for Gram-negative bacteria by the direct testing of positive blood cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14030249","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prompt administration of optimal antibiotic therapy is essential in the management of bacteraemia to reduce morbidity and mortality and to facilitate antibiotic stewardship. To identify the most effective therapy, rapid and accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is essential. ASTar is an automated AST system that delivers minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for 23 antimicrobials and is designed for testing Gram-negative bacteria directly from positive blood cultures, with results available after 6 h. Methods: The ASTar system was evaluated with 64 positive blood cultures from patients with bacteraemia and 56 simulated blood cultures inoculated with a range of antibiotic-resistant isolates. The ASTar results for 12 antibiotics commonly used in our hospitals were compared with the results derived from three different methods of disc susceptibility testing and MICs determined by broth microdilution (BMD). Results: For 121 isolates of Gram-negative bacteria, ASTar showed an average essential agreement of 87.2% and an average categorical agreement of 94%, when compared with BMD. Very major errors (false susceptibility) and major errors (false resistance) were associated with 0.9% and 3.4% of results, respectively. The results were at least as accurate as those obtained from EUCAST disc susceptibility methods (both rapid and overnight methods). Conclusions: The ASTar system is an effective method for delivering accurate and rapid (6 h) AST results for Gram-negative bacteria by the direct testing of positive blood cultures.

评估 ASTar 自动抗菌检测系统对阳性血液培养物中革兰氏阴性菌的检测效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信