Kinetic Patterns of Antibiotic Consumption in German Acute Care Hospitals from 2017 to 2023.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Birgitta Schweickert, Niklas Willrich, Marcel Feig, Marc Schneider, Michael Behnke, Luis Alberto Peña Diaz, Christine Geffers, Imke Wieters, Karin Gröschner, Doreen Richter, Alexandra Hoffmann, Tim Eckmanns, Muna Abu Sin
{"title":"Kinetic Patterns of Antibiotic Consumption in German Acute Care Hospitals from 2017 to 2023.","authors":"Birgitta Schweickert, Niklas Willrich, Marcel Feig, Marc Schneider, Michael Behnke, Luis Alberto Peña Diaz, Christine Geffers, Imke Wieters, Karin Gröschner, Doreen Richter, Alexandra Hoffmann, Tim Eckmanns, Muna Abu Sin","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics14030316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Antimicrobial consumption (AMC) patterns, besides prescribing behaviors, reflect the changing epidemiology of infectious diseases. Routine surveillance data have been used to investigate the development of AMC from 2017 to 2023 and the impact of COVID-19 within the context of the framing time periods. <b>Methods:</b> Data from 112 hospitals, continuously participating from 2017 to 2023 in the national surveillance system of hospital antimicrobial consumption based at the Robert Koch Institute, were analyzed according to the WHO ATC (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical)/DDD (Defined Daily Dose) method and categorized according to the WHO AWaRe-classification. AMC was quantified by consumption density (CD) expressed in DDD/100 patient days (PD) and DDD/100 admissions (AD). The time period was subdivided into three phases: pre-pandemic phase (2017-2019), main pandemic phase (2020-2021) and transition phase (2022-2023). Linear regression models have been used to determine the presence of an overall trend, the change in intra-phasic trends and phase-specific mean consumption levels over time. <b>Results:</b> From 2017 to 2023 total antibiotic consumption decreased by 7% from 57.1 to 52.9 DDD/100 PD. Four main kinetic patterns emerged across different antibiotic classes: Pattern 1 displays a decreasing pre-pandemic trend, which slowed down throughout the pandemic and transition phase and was exhibited by second-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. Pattern 2 reveals a rising pre-pandemic trend, which decelerated in the pandemic phase and accelerated again in the transition phase and was expressed by aminopenicillins/beta-lactamase inhibitors, beta-lactamase sensitive pencillins, azithromycin and first-generation cephalosporins. Pattern 3 shows elevated mean consumption levels in the pandemic phase exhibited by carbapenems, glycopeptides, linezolid and third-generation cephalosporins. Pattern 4 reveals a rising trend throughout the pre-pandemic and pandemic phase, which reversed in the transition phase without achieving pre-pandemic levels and was expressed by beta-lactamase resistant penicillins, daptomycin, fosfomycin (parenteral) and ceftazidime/avibactam. <b>Conclusions:</b> Kinetic consumption patterns across different antibiotic classes might reflect COVID-19-related effects and associated changes in the epidemiology of co-circulating pathogens and health care supply. Broad-spectrum antibiotics with persisting elevated consumption levels throughout the transition phase require special attention and focused antimicrobial stewardship activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14030316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial consumption (AMC) patterns, besides prescribing behaviors, reflect the changing epidemiology of infectious diseases. Routine surveillance data have been used to investigate the development of AMC from 2017 to 2023 and the impact of COVID-19 within the context of the framing time periods. Methods: Data from 112 hospitals, continuously participating from 2017 to 2023 in the national surveillance system of hospital antimicrobial consumption based at the Robert Koch Institute, were analyzed according to the WHO ATC (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical)/DDD (Defined Daily Dose) method and categorized according to the WHO AWaRe-classification. AMC was quantified by consumption density (CD) expressed in DDD/100 patient days (PD) and DDD/100 admissions (AD). The time period was subdivided into three phases: pre-pandemic phase (2017-2019), main pandemic phase (2020-2021) and transition phase (2022-2023). Linear regression models have been used to determine the presence of an overall trend, the change in intra-phasic trends and phase-specific mean consumption levels over time. Results: From 2017 to 2023 total antibiotic consumption decreased by 7% from 57.1 to 52.9 DDD/100 PD. Four main kinetic patterns emerged across different antibiotic classes: Pattern 1 displays a decreasing pre-pandemic trend, which slowed down throughout the pandemic and transition phase and was exhibited by second-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. Pattern 2 reveals a rising pre-pandemic trend, which decelerated in the pandemic phase and accelerated again in the transition phase and was expressed by aminopenicillins/beta-lactamase inhibitors, beta-lactamase sensitive pencillins, azithromycin and first-generation cephalosporins. Pattern 3 shows elevated mean consumption levels in the pandemic phase exhibited by carbapenems, glycopeptides, linezolid and third-generation cephalosporins. Pattern 4 reveals a rising trend throughout the pre-pandemic and pandemic phase, which reversed in the transition phase without achieving pre-pandemic levels and was expressed by beta-lactamase resistant penicillins, daptomycin, fosfomycin (parenteral) and ceftazidime/avibactam. Conclusions: Kinetic consumption patterns across different antibiotic classes might reflect COVID-19-related effects and associated changes in the epidemiology of co-circulating pathogens and health care supply. Broad-spectrum antibiotics with persisting elevated consumption levels throughout the transition phase require special attention and focused antimicrobial stewardship activities.

2017 年至 2023 年德国急诊医院抗生素消费的动力学模式。
背景:抗菌药物消费模式除处方行为外,还反映了传染病流行病学的变化。利用常规监测数据调查2017 - 2023年AMC的发展情况以及2019冠状病毒病在框架时间段内的影响。方法:根据WHO解剖治疗化学(ATC)/限定日剂量(DDD)方法对2017 - 2023年持续参与Robert Koch研究所全国医院抗菌药物使用监测系统的112家医院的数据进行分析,并根据WHO aware分类进行分类。用DDD/100患者日(PD)和DDD/100入院(AD)表示的消耗密度(CD)来量化AMC。这段时间又分为三个阶段:大流行前阶段(2017-2019年)、大流行主要阶段(2020-2021年)和过渡阶段(2022-2023年)。线性回归模型已被用来确定总体趋势的存在、阶段内趋势的变化和特定阶段的平均消费水平随时间的变化。结果:2017 - 2023年,抗生素总消费量从57.1 DDD/100 PD下降到52.9 DDD/100 PD,下降了7%。在不同抗生素类别中出现了四种主要的动力学模式:模式1显示大流行前下降趋势,在整个大流行和过渡阶段放缓,第二代头孢菌素和氟喹诺酮类药物表现出这种趋势。模式2显示大流行前的上升趋势,在大流行阶段减速,在过渡阶段再次加速,并由氨基霉素/ β -内酰胺酶抑制剂、β -内酰胺酶敏感的青霉素、阿奇霉素和第一代头孢菌素表达。模式3显示,碳青霉烯类、糖肽类、利奈唑胺和第三代头孢菌素在大流行阶段的平均消费水平升高。模式4显示在整个大流行前和大流行阶段呈上升趋势,在过渡阶段出现逆转,但未达到大流行前的水平,并通过β -内酰胺酶耐药青霉素、达托霉素、磷霉素(注射)和头孢他啶/阿维巴坦表达。结论:不同抗生素类别的动态消费模式可能反映了与covid -19相关的影响以及共循环病原体和卫生保健供应的流行病学变化。在整个过渡阶段消费水平持续升高的广谱抗生素需要特别关注和集中抗菌素管理活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信