Renato V Samala, Meena Bhaskaruni, Brittany T Peterre, Kimberlee Fong, Kathryn Richards, Anu Shrestha, David Harris, Xiaoying Chen, Laura K Shoemaker
{"title":"Billed Advance Care Planning Conversations by a Growing Palliative Care Team: Insights from a Five-Year Review.","authors":"Renato V Samala, Meena Bhaskaruni, Brittany T Peterre, Kimberlee Fong, Kathryn Richards, Anu Shrestha, David Harris, Xiaoying Chen, Laura K Shoemaker","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> In 2015, two Current Procedural Terminology codes were introduced for advance care planning (ACP), enabling a palliative care (PC) team to track its ACP conversations. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To examine billed ACP conversations over five years. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Retrospective analysis. <b><i>Setting/Subjects</i></b>: PC patients in a large Midwest U.S. health care system. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Demographic information, service location, ACP codes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> From 2017 to 2021, total billed ACP conversations and PC clinicians increased from 381 to 5718 and 27 to 41, respectively. Of 10,307 unique patients from 17,091 billed conversations, the majority were female (52%), White (74%), and non-Hispanic (96%); 32% of in-state patients resided in areas of health care underutilization. Conversations occurred mostly (81%) in the hospital setting. A single 30-minute code was used in 81% of conversations. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Integration of ACP billing into a growing PC team across five years saw a rise in billed ACP conversations and predominance of certain patient groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0498","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In 2015, two Current Procedural Terminology codes were introduced for advance care planning (ACP), enabling a palliative care (PC) team to track its ACP conversations. Objective: To examine billed ACP conversations over five years. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting/Subjects: PC patients in a large Midwest U.S. health care system. Measurements: Demographic information, service location, ACP codes. Results: From 2017 to 2021, total billed ACP conversations and PC clinicians increased from 381 to 5718 and 27 to 41, respectively. Of 10,307 unique patients from 17,091 billed conversations, the majority were female (52%), White (74%), and non-Hispanic (96%); 32% of in-state patients resided in areas of health care underutilization. Conversations occurred mostly (81%) in the hospital setting. A single 30-minute code was used in 81% of conversations. Conclusion: Integration of ACP billing into a growing PC team across five years saw a rise in billed ACP conversations and predominance of certain patient groups.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments.
The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.