Personal Quality of Life as an Outcome Measure of Antipsychotic Drug Management of Problem Behaviours in Adults with Intellectual Developmental Disorders with or Without Autism Spectrum Disorder.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Marco O Bertelli, Annamaria Bianco, Micaela Piva Merli, Maria Stella Vescio, Michele Rossi, Elisabetta F Buonaguro
{"title":"Personal Quality of Life as an Outcome Measure of Antipsychotic Drug Management of Problem Behaviours in Adults with Intellectual Developmental Disorders with or Without Autism Spectrum Disorder.","authors":"Marco O Bertelli, Annamaria Bianco, Micaela Piva Merli, Maria Stella Vescio, Michele Rossi, Elisabetta F Buonaguro","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15030316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> First-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are frequently prescribed for the management of problem behaviours (PBs) in people with intellectual developmental disorders (IDDs) with or without autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the different effectiveness of these two groups of drugs has not been adequately investigated, especially in terms of person-centred outcomes, such as quality of life (QoL). The aim of the present observational study was to compare the personal QoL of two groups of people with IDDs with and without ASD, attending the same residential facility, but receiving FGAs and SGAs, respectively, for the management of PBs. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-two people with IDDs (ten with ASD) receiving FGAs and twenty-three (eleven with ASD) receiving SGAs for the management of PBs were consecutively recruited. The participants underwent a complex clinical and instrumental evaluation, including the systematic psychopathological assessment for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities-general screening (SPAIDD-G), the Wing's handicaps, behaviours, and skills schedule (HBS), the DOTES, and the BASIQ (QoL Assessment tool battery). Follow-up evaluations were carried out after 6, 12, and 18 months. <b>Results:</b> The use of antipsychotics was withdrawn only in 16 cases, of which only 4 were for significant improvement. Treatment with FGAs was associated with more frequent discontinuation, a higher incidence of side effects, and a trend toward a lower efficacy on PBs than treatment with SGAs. FGAs also improved generic QoL significantly less than SGAs. <b>Conclusions:</b> The present pilot study is the first to compare FGAs and SGAs with respect to the generic QoL in people with IDDs and PBs. SGAs resulted to have a significantly greater positive impact on QoL than FGAs, despite demonstrating similar efficacy in treating PBs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: First-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are frequently prescribed for the management of problem behaviours (PBs) in people with intellectual developmental disorders (IDDs) with or without autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the different effectiveness of these two groups of drugs has not been adequately investigated, especially in terms of person-centred outcomes, such as quality of life (QoL). The aim of the present observational study was to compare the personal QoL of two groups of people with IDDs with and without ASD, attending the same residential facility, but receiving FGAs and SGAs, respectively, for the management of PBs. Methods: Twenty-two people with IDDs (ten with ASD) receiving FGAs and twenty-three (eleven with ASD) receiving SGAs for the management of PBs were consecutively recruited. The participants underwent a complex clinical and instrumental evaluation, including the systematic psychopathological assessment for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities-general screening (SPAIDD-G), the Wing's handicaps, behaviours, and skills schedule (HBS), the DOTES, and the BASIQ (QoL Assessment tool battery). Follow-up evaluations were carried out after 6, 12, and 18 months. Results: The use of antipsychotics was withdrawn only in 16 cases, of which only 4 were for significant improvement. Treatment with FGAs was associated with more frequent discontinuation, a higher incidence of side effects, and a trend toward a lower efficacy on PBs than treatment with SGAs. FGAs also improved generic QoL significantly less than SGAs. Conclusions: The present pilot study is the first to compare FGAs and SGAs with respect to the generic QoL in people with IDDs and PBs. SGAs resulted to have a significantly greater positive impact on QoL than FGAs, despite demonstrating similar efficacy in treating PBs.

个人生活质量作为有或无自闭症谱系障碍的智力发育障碍成人问题行为的抗精神病药物管理的结果测量。
背景/目的:第一代抗精神病药物(FGAs)和第二代抗精神病药物(SGAs)经常用于治疗伴有或不伴有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的智力发育障碍(IDDs)患者的问题行为(PBs)。然而,这两组药物的不同有效性尚未得到充分调查,特别是在以人为中心的结果方面,如生活质量(QoL)。本观察性研究的目的是比较两组有和没有ASD的idd患者的个人生活质量,他们住在同一家住宅设施,但分别接受FGAs和SGAs来管理PBs。方法:连续招募22例IDDs患者(10例合并ASD)接受FGAs治疗,23例(11例合并ASD)接受SGAs治疗。参与者接受了复杂的临床和工具评估,包括智力和发育障碍者的系统精神病理学评估-一般筛查(SPAIDD-G), Wing的残疾,行为和技能计划(HBS), DOTES和BASIQ(生活质量评估工具组)。分别在6、12、18个月后进行随访评估。结果:仅16例患者停止使用抗精神病药物,其中有明显改善的仅4例。与SGAs治疗相比,FGAs治疗与更频繁的停药、更高的副作用发生率以及对PBs的疗效更低的趋势相关。FGAs对一般生活质量的改善也明显低于SGAs。结论:目前的试点研究是第一个比较FGAs和SGAs在IDDs和PBs患者的一般生活质量方面的研究。尽管在治疗PBs方面表现出相似的疗效,但SGAs对生活质量的积极影响明显大于FGAs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信