Comparative Effects of Temporal Interference and High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Spontaneous Neuronal Activity in the Primary Motor Cortex: A Randomized Crossover Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Zhiqiang Zhu, Lang Qin, Dongsheng Tang, Zhenyu Qian, Jie Zhuang, Yu Liu
{"title":"Comparative Effects of Temporal Interference and High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Spontaneous Neuronal Activity in the Primary Motor Cortex: A Randomized Crossover Study.","authors":"Zhiqiang Zhu, Lang Qin, Dongsheng Tang, Zhenyu Qian, Jie Zhuang, Yu Liu","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15030317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Modulating spontaneous neuronal activity is critical for understanding and potentially treating neurological disorders, yet the comparative effects of different non-invasive brain stimulation techniques remain underexplored. <b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to systematically compare the effects of temporal interference (TI) stimulation and high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on spontaneous neuronal activity in the primary motor cortex. <b>Methods:</b> In a randomized, crossover design, forty right-handed participants underwent two 20 min sessions of either TI or HD-tDCS. Resting-state fMRI data were collected at four stages: pre-stimulus baseline (S1), first half of stimulation (S2), second half of stimulation (S3), and post-stimulation (S4). We analyzed changes in regional homogeneity (ReHo), dynamic ReHo (dReHo), fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFFs), and dynamic fALFFs (dfALFFs) to assess the impact on spontaneous neuronal activity. <b>Results:</b> The analysis revealed that TI had a more significant impact on ReHo, especially in the left superior temporal gyrus and postcentral gyrus, compared with HD-tDCS. Both stimulation methods exhibited their strongest effects during the second half of the stimulation period, but only TI maintained significant activity in the post-stimulation phase. Additionally, both TI and HD-tDCS enhanced fALFFs in real-time, with TI showing more pronounced effects in sensorimotor regions. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that TI exerts a more potent and sustained influence on spontaneous neuronal activity than HD-tDCS. This enhanced understanding of their differential effects provides valuable insights for optimizing non-invasive brain stimulation protocols for therapeutic applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030317","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Modulating spontaneous neuronal activity is critical for understanding and potentially treating neurological disorders, yet the comparative effects of different non-invasive brain stimulation techniques remain underexplored. Objective: This study aimed to systematically compare the effects of temporal interference (TI) stimulation and high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on spontaneous neuronal activity in the primary motor cortex. Methods: In a randomized, crossover design, forty right-handed participants underwent two 20 min sessions of either TI or HD-tDCS. Resting-state fMRI data were collected at four stages: pre-stimulus baseline (S1), first half of stimulation (S2), second half of stimulation (S3), and post-stimulation (S4). We analyzed changes in regional homogeneity (ReHo), dynamic ReHo (dReHo), fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFFs), and dynamic fALFFs (dfALFFs) to assess the impact on spontaneous neuronal activity. Results: The analysis revealed that TI had a more significant impact on ReHo, especially in the left superior temporal gyrus and postcentral gyrus, compared with HD-tDCS. Both stimulation methods exhibited their strongest effects during the second half of the stimulation period, but only TI maintained significant activity in the post-stimulation phase. Additionally, both TI and HD-tDCS enhanced fALFFs in real-time, with TI showing more pronounced effects in sensorimotor regions. Conclusions: These findings suggest that TI exerts a more potent and sustained influence on spontaneous neuronal activity than HD-tDCS. This enhanced understanding of their differential effects provides valuable insights for optimizing non-invasive brain stimulation protocols for therapeutic applications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信