Mindfulness-Based Intervention Effects on EEG and Executive Functions: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Gilberto Galindo-Aldana, Luis Arturo Montoya-Rivera, Jose Jaime Esqueda-Elizondo, Everardo Inzunza-Gonzalez, Enrique Efren Garcia-Guerrero, Alfredo Padilla-Lopez, Tara G Bautista, Cynthia Torres-González
{"title":"Mindfulness-Based Intervention Effects on EEG and Executive Functions: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Gilberto Galindo-Aldana, Luis Arturo Montoya-Rivera, Jose Jaime Esqueda-Elizondo, Everardo Inzunza-Gonzalez, Enrique Efren Garcia-Guerrero, Alfredo Padilla-Lopez, Tara G Bautista, Cynthia Torres-González","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15030324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have emerged as an alternative intervention for symptoms of psychological and psychiatric conditions, such as depression, anxiety, and emotional discomfort. Over the last ten years, MBIs have established a growing body of evidence that shows cognitive and neurophysiological benefits. Depression and anxiety are conditions with a high prevalence in the world population. In developing countries, it is reported that, given the conditions of being at a social disadvantage, anxiety and depression are higher, resulting in compromised psychological well-being and mental health. <b>Objectives.</b> This systematic review aims to quantitatively and qualitatively assess changes in the neuropsychological, particularly executive functioning and social cognition domains, and electroencephalographical (EEG) effects of MBIs. <b>Methods.</b> A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) in three databases, Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCO MedLine complete; 14,464 articles were found, 141 articles evaluated the effects of MBI on executive functioning, and 16 included both as in qualitative and quantitative variables. <b>Results.</b> The qualitative results show that the research on the effects of MBI on behavior and cognitive skills, including executive function, social cognition, and EEG analysis, is very scarce but consistent in suggesting strong correlations on cognitive and electrophysiological alpha-beta proportions asymmetry on frontal areas. Undoubtedly, executive functions, as a behavioral regulatory and self-monitoring system, are the most popular study of interest in the literature, including emotional regulation, awareness, planning, social skills, and focused attention. Although there are fewer studies assessing the effects of MBIs on social cognition skills. The funnel plot showed a symmetrical distribution but ranked out of significant correlation. Most estimates of treatment effects are positive (58%); however, the average outcome observed did not significantly differ from zero. <b>Conclusions.</b> This study concludes that the research integrating the analysis of the electrophysiological and executive function effects of MBI shows important methodological variations and clinical conditions, which explains the significant results reported individually. Even when most of the literature reports positive effects of MBIs on several behavioral and neurophysiological domains, there are still confounding factors that must be taken into consideration by researchers and clinicians before attributing possible inaccurate or generalizable benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have emerged as an alternative intervention for symptoms of psychological and psychiatric conditions, such as depression, anxiety, and emotional discomfort. Over the last ten years, MBIs have established a growing body of evidence that shows cognitive and neurophysiological benefits. Depression and anxiety are conditions with a high prevalence in the world population. In developing countries, it is reported that, given the conditions of being at a social disadvantage, anxiety and depression are higher, resulting in compromised psychological well-being and mental health. Objectives. This systematic review aims to quantitatively and qualitatively assess changes in the neuropsychological, particularly executive functioning and social cognition domains, and electroencephalographical (EEG) effects of MBIs. Methods. A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) in three databases, Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCO MedLine complete; 14,464 articles were found, 141 articles evaluated the effects of MBI on executive functioning, and 16 included both as in qualitative and quantitative variables. Results. The qualitative results show that the research on the effects of MBI on behavior and cognitive skills, including executive function, social cognition, and EEG analysis, is very scarce but consistent in suggesting strong correlations on cognitive and electrophysiological alpha-beta proportions asymmetry on frontal areas. Undoubtedly, executive functions, as a behavioral regulatory and self-monitoring system, are the most popular study of interest in the literature, including emotional regulation, awareness, planning, social skills, and focused attention. Although there are fewer studies assessing the effects of MBIs on social cognition skills. The funnel plot showed a symmetrical distribution but ranked out of significant correlation. Most estimates of treatment effects are positive (58%); however, the average outcome observed did not significantly differ from zero. Conclusions. This study concludes that the research integrating the analysis of the electrophysiological and executive function effects of MBI shows important methodological variations and clinical conditions, which explains the significant results reported individually. Even when most of the literature reports positive effects of MBIs on several behavioral and neurophysiological domains, there are still confounding factors that must be taken into consideration by researchers and clinicians before attributing possible inaccurate or generalizable benefits.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信