Methodological Approaches to Pain Memory Assessment in Chronic Pain: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Carlos Forner-Álvarez, Ferran Cuenca-Martínez
{"title":"Methodological Approaches to Pain Memory Assessment in Chronic Pain: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Carlos Forner-Álvarez, Ferran Cuenca-Martínez","doi":"10.3390/brainsci15030308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Pain memory refers to the ability to encode, store, and recall information related to a specific pain event. Reviewing its common features is crucial, as it provides researchers with a foundational guide for designing studies that assess pain memory in individuals with chronic pain. The primary objective of this study was to examine the common characteristics-particularly the methodological approaches-of existing research on pain memory in adults with chronic pain. <b>Methods:</b> A scoping review was conducted using PubMed and Embase as search databases. Studies were included if they met the following criteria. (a) It involved only adults with chronic pain and (b) assessed at least one of the following parameters: pain intensity or pain unpleasantness. The exclusion criteria were the following: (a) not having pain memory assessment as a primary objective, (b) including participants under 18 years of age, (c) involving individuals without chronic pain (e.g., those with acute pain or healthy participants), (d) lacking essential information, or (e) unavailability of the full text. <b>Results:</b> From an initial pool of 4585 papers, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies exclusively involved adults with chronic pain, and all reported pain intensity, while only 27% assessed pain unpleasantness. Additionally, psychosocial variables were the most frequently reported non-pain-related outcomes. Regarding study protocols, most relied on daily data collection, with the most common recall period being within the first 48 h. <b>Conclusions:</b> The methodological characteristics identified in this review-particularly those with a high frequency of occurrence-should serve as fundamental guidelines for future research on pain memory in adults with chronic pain, and should be carefully considered by investigators in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":9095,"journal":{"name":"Brain Sciences","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15030308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Pain memory refers to the ability to encode, store, and recall information related to a specific pain event. Reviewing its common features is crucial, as it provides researchers with a foundational guide for designing studies that assess pain memory in individuals with chronic pain. The primary objective of this study was to examine the common characteristics-particularly the methodological approaches-of existing research on pain memory in adults with chronic pain. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using PubMed and Embase as search databases. Studies were included if they met the following criteria. (a) It involved only adults with chronic pain and (b) assessed at least one of the following parameters: pain intensity or pain unpleasantness. The exclusion criteria were the following: (a) not having pain memory assessment as a primary objective, (b) including participants under 18 years of age, (c) involving individuals without chronic pain (e.g., those with acute pain or healthy participants), (d) lacking essential information, or (e) unavailability of the full text. Results: From an initial pool of 4585 papers, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies exclusively involved adults with chronic pain, and all reported pain intensity, while only 27% assessed pain unpleasantness. Additionally, psychosocial variables were the most frequently reported non-pain-related outcomes. Regarding study protocols, most relied on daily data collection, with the most common recall period being within the first 48 h. Conclusions: The methodological characteristics identified in this review-particularly those with a high frequency of occurrence-should serve as fundamental guidelines for future research on pain memory in adults with chronic pain, and should be carefully considered by investigators in this field.

慢性疼痛中疼痛记忆评估的方法学方法:范围综述。
背景/目的:疼痛记忆是指对与特定疼痛事件相关的信息进行编码、存储和回忆的能力。回顾其共同特征是至关重要的,因为它为研究人员设计评估慢性疼痛个体疼痛记忆的研究提供了基础指导。本研究的主要目的是检查现有的成人慢性疼痛记忆研究的共同特征,特别是方法方法。方法:使用PubMed和Embase作为检索数据库进行范围综述。符合以下标准的研究被纳入。(a)仅涉及患有慢性疼痛的成年人,(b)评估以下参数中的至少一个:疼痛强度或疼痛不愉快。排除标准如下:(a)没有将疼痛记忆评估作为主要目标,(b)包括18岁以下的参与者,(c)涉及没有慢性疼痛的个体(例如,急性疼痛或健康参与者),(d)缺乏基本信息,或(e)无法获得全文。结果:在最初的4585篇论文中,有11篇研究符合纳入标准。所有的研究都只涉及患有慢性疼痛的成年人,并且都报告了疼痛强度,而只有27%的人评估了疼痛的不愉快程度。此外,心理社会变量是最常报道的与疼痛无关的结果。关于研究方案,大多数依赖于日常数据收集,最常见的回忆期是在最初的48小时内。结论:本综述中确定的方法学特征,特别是那些发生频率高的特征,应该作为未来研究成人慢性疼痛记忆的基本指导方针,并且应该被该领域的研究者仔细考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Sciences
Brain Sciences Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1472
审稿时长
18.71 days
期刊介绍: Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes and short communications in the areas of cognitive neuroscience, developmental neuroscience, molecular and cellular neuroscience, neural engineering, neuroimaging, neurolinguistics, neuropathy, systems neuroscience, and theoretical and computational neuroscience. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信