Affinity For Aloneness, Motivations Underlying Time Spent Alone, and Associations with Psychosocial Well-Being: A Comparison of High-Ability and Typical Adolescents
{"title":"Affinity For Aloneness, Motivations Underlying Time Spent Alone, and Associations with Psychosocial Well-Being: A Comparison of High-Ability and Typical Adolescents","authors":"Sofie Hendrix, Jeroen Lavrijsen, Luc Goossens, Karine Verschueren","doi":"10.1007/s10964-025-02175-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research on adolescent aloneness and well-being yielded mixed results and adolescents’ specific motivations for spending time alone remain underexamined from a qualitative perspective. High-ability adolescents have been proposed to experience a greater affinity for aloneness than typical adolescents, yet empirical evidence on this differential need and specific motivations for time spent alone is lacking. This mixed-method study examined motivations underlying time spent alone, their relations to psychosocial well-being, and differences between high-ability and typical adolescents in a matched sample. The sample consisted of 540 adolescents (M<sub>age </sub>= 16.25 years, SD<sub>age</sub> = 0.39, age range = 13.3–17.9 years, 42% female), with 270 adolescents identified as high-ability (M<sub>IQ</sub> = 128) and 270 typical adolescents (M<sub>IQ</sub> = 104). Both positive and negative motivations for time spent alone emerged, with only negative motivations being associated with poorer psychosocial well-being. Compared to typical adolescents, high-ability adolescents reported a stronger affinity for aloneness and more often cited one negative motivation for spending time alone, that is, feeling unable to be themselves around others. These findings underscore the need to identify and provide targeted support to high-ability students who isolate themselves due to social misfit.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02175-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research on adolescent aloneness and well-being yielded mixed results and adolescents’ specific motivations for spending time alone remain underexamined from a qualitative perspective. High-ability adolescents have been proposed to experience a greater affinity for aloneness than typical adolescents, yet empirical evidence on this differential need and specific motivations for time spent alone is lacking. This mixed-method study examined motivations underlying time spent alone, their relations to psychosocial well-being, and differences between high-ability and typical adolescents in a matched sample. The sample consisted of 540 adolescents (Mage = 16.25 years, SDage = 0.39, age range = 13.3–17.9 years, 42% female), with 270 adolescents identified as high-ability (MIQ = 128) and 270 typical adolescents (MIQ = 104). Both positive and negative motivations for time spent alone emerged, with only negative motivations being associated with poorer psychosocial well-being. Compared to typical adolescents, high-ability adolescents reported a stronger affinity for aloneness and more often cited one negative motivation for spending time alone, that is, feeling unable to be themselves around others. These findings underscore the need to identify and provide targeted support to high-ability students who isolate themselves due to social misfit.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.