Strategic Learning Principles Are Related to Academic Scores for Doctor of Physical Therapy Students.

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Science Educator Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s40670-024-02215-5
B Reynolds, C Minahan
{"title":"Strategic Learning Principles Are Related to Academic Scores for Doctor of Physical Therapy Students.","authors":"B Reynolds, C Minahan","doi":"10.1007/s40670-024-02215-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) is a self-assessment of strategic learning principles with scores representing areas for growth. The purpose of this study was to measure LASSI scores at 2 points in time for Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students in a 2-year hybrid program to see if scores changed after a science of learning course and two quarters of the program. The authors then examined the relationship between LASSI scores and academic scores (DPT program GPA, anatomy, and physiology grades).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective descriptive analysis of LASSI scores with comparisons between baseline and after a science of learning course and two quarters of the program using a paired <i>t</i>-test; bivariate correlations examined the relationship of LASSI scores to academic scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was collected for 259 matriculated DPT students. Three of the 10 LASSI scales had significant change after the science of learning course and two quarters of the program; however, the effect sizes were small (0.2 or less). Anxiety management (<i>t</i>(258) = 2.340, <i>p</i> = .020) scores improved, while both concentrations (<i>t</i>(258) =  - 3.229, <i>p</i> = .001) and the use of academic resources (<i>t</i>(258) =  - 1.999, <i>p</i> = .047) had lower scores. There were several LASSI scores with significant correlations to academic scores (<i>ρ</i> = .132 to .431).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>LASSI was related to academic scores, although the strength of the relationship was low to negligible. LASSI showed small changes over time. There could be various reasons for scores improving or declining, but the awareness of scores and change in scores can provide a solid foundation for individualized coaching to DPT students as they navigate the rigor of a graduate level professional program.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02215-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"35 1","pages":"437-446"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02215-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) is a self-assessment of strategic learning principles with scores representing areas for growth. The purpose of this study was to measure LASSI scores at 2 points in time for Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students in a 2-year hybrid program to see if scores changed after a science of learning course and two quarters of the program. The authors then examined the relationship between LASSI scores and academic scores (DPT program GPA, anatomy, and physiology grades).

Methods: Retrospective descriptive analysis of LASSI scores with comparisons between baseline and after a science of learning course and two quarters of the program using a paired t-test; bivariate correlations examined the relationship of LASSI scores to academic scores.

Results: Data was collected for 259 matriculated DPT students. Three of the 10 LASSI scales had significant change after the science of learning course and two quarters of the program; however, the effect sizes were small (0.2 or less). Anxiety management (t(258) = 2.340, p = .020) scores improved, while both concentrations (t(258) =  - 3.229, p = .001) and the use of academic resources (t(258) =  - 1.999, p = .047) had lower scores. There were several LASSI scores with significant correlations to academic scores (ρ = .132 to .431).

Discussion/conclusion: LASSI was related to academic scores, although the strength of the relationship was low to negligible. LASSI showed small changes over time. There could be various reasons for scores improving or declining, but the awareness of scores and change in scores can provide a solid foundation for individualized coaching to DPT students as they navigate the rigor of a graduate level professional program.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02215-5.

策略学习原则与物理治疗博士学生学业成绩的关系
学习和学习策略量表(LASSI)是一种对策略学习原则的自我评估,分数代表了成长领域。本研究的目的是测量物理治疗博士(DPT)学生在2年混合课程中2点的LASSI分数,以了解分数在科学学习课程和两个季度的课程后是否发生变化。作者随后检查了LASSI分数与学业成绩(DPT课程GPA、解剖学和生理学成绩)之间的关系。方法:采用配对t检验对LASSI评分进行回顾性描述性分析,比较基线和科学学习课程后的LASSI评分以及两个季度的课程;双变量相关性检验了LASSI分数与学业分数的关系。结果:收集了259名DPT录取学生的数据。10个LASSI量表中有3个在学习科学课程和2 / 4课程结束后发生了显著变化;然而,效应量很小(0.2或更小)。焦虑管理(t(258) = 2.340, p = 0.020)得分提高,而注意力集中(t(258) = - 3.229, p = 0.001)和学术资源利用(t(258) = - 1.999, p = 0.047)得分降低。有几个LASSI分数与学业成绩显著相关(ρ =)。132到0.431)。讨论/结论:LASSI与学业成绩相关,尽管这种关系的强度低到可以忽略不计。随着时间的推移,LASSI显示出微小的变化。分数的提高或下降可能有各种各样的原因,但对分数和分数变化的认识可以为DPT学生提供个性化指导的坚实基础,因为他们可以驾驭严格的研究生水平的专业课程。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s40670-024-02215-5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Educator
Medical Science Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信