The Predictive Power of Short Answer Questions in Undergraduate Medical Education Progress Difficulty.

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Science Educator Pub Date : 2024-12-04 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s40670-024-02197-4
Keyna Bracken, Amr Saleh, Jeremy Sandor, Matthew Sibbald, Micheal Lee-Poy, Quang Ngo
{"title":"The Predictive Power of Short Answer Questions in Undergraduate Medical Education Progress Difficulty.","authors":"Keyna Bracken, Amr Saleh, Jeremy Sandor, Matthew Sibbald, Micheal Lee-Poy, Quang Ngo","doi":"10.1007/s40670-024-02197-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To better understand the link between formative assessments and progress difficulty, we conducted an analysis in the undergraduate MD program of the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine by comparing formative assessment scores on Short Answer Questions (SAQ) called Concept Application Exercises (CAE) with subsequent progress difficulty. CAE scores are designed to formatively assess knowledge translation. These scores are not formally incorporated into the progress decision at the end of each curricular unit, which is holistic in nature. Students are referred to a student progress remediation committee if they fail to meet the curricular objectives. We sought to investigate the following research question: Do short answer questions, in the form of CAEs, predict subsequent learner progress difficulty?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the last four student cohorts of 2022-2025 were included. To address the predictive power of CAE score characteristics, a binary logistic regression model was constructed with remediation committee referral as the dependent variable and CAE score characteristics as the independent variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study found that the average CAE score is the most powerful predictor of later progress difficulty, with each point drop in average score associated with a 37% increase in the odds of referral to the remediation committee.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings illustrate the predictive value of the SAQ to identify later progress difficulty.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"35 1","pages":"351-358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02197-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To better understand the link between formative assessments and progress difficulty, we conducted an analysis in the undergraduate MD program of the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine by comparing formative assessment scores on Short Answer Questions (SAQ) called Concept Application Exercises (CAE) with subsequent progress difficulty. CAE scores are designed to formatively assess knowledge translation. These scores are not formally incorporated into the progress decision at the end of each curricular unit, which is holistic in nature. Students are referred to a student progress remediation committee if they fail to meet the curricular objectives. We sought to investigate the following research question: Do short answer questions, in the form of CAEs, predict subsequent learner progress difficulty?

Methods: Data from the last four student cohorts of 2022-2025 were included. To address the predictive power of CAE score characteristics, a binary logistic regression model was constructed with remediation committee referral as the dependent variable and CAE score characteristics as the independent variable.

Results: This study found that the average CAE score is the most powerful predictor of later progress difficulty, with each point drop in average score associated with a 37% increase in the odds of referral to the remediation committee.

Conclusion: These findings illustrate the predictive value of the SAQ to identify later progress difficulty.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Educator
Medical Science Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信