HOW TO SUSTAIN A STRIKE: Rules, Routines, and the Essential in Kashmir

IF 1.9 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
NISHITA TRISAL
{"title":"HOW TO SUSTAIN A STRIKE: Rules, Routines, and the Essential in Kashmir","authors":"NISHITA TRISAL","doi":"10.14506/ca40.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the 2016–2017 general strike <i>(hartal</i> or <i>bandh</i>) in Indian-controlled Kashmir, the site of a nearly eighty-year struggle for self-determination. Drawing on twenty-two months of ethnographic fieldwork (2016–2018) conducted in the capital city of Srinagar amid and in the aftermath of the indefinite strike, I show how the strike and the suspension of daily life it entailed was sustained through novel spatiotemporal techniques that coordinated and routinized the actions of the Kashmiri public. Yet sustaining the strike was not only defined by routine and self-restraint. Instead, as the article demonstrates, certain forms of financial labor, too, prolonged the strike—but they did so, counterintuitively, by breaking it. I focus in particular on Kashmiri bank employees, who were at times seen as betraying the strike, but who described their continued work during strike hours as essential for keeping the economy and hence society running. By emphasizing bank employees' liminal position of breaking the strike while supporting the cause of Kashmiri self-determination, I highlight the labor, sacrifice, and ambivalence that sustain—and threaten to unravel—political mobilizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51423,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Anthropology","volume":"40 1","pages":"162-190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.14506/ca40.1.07","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.14506/ca40.1.07","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the 2016–2017 general strike (hartal or bandh) in Indian-controlled Kashmir, the site of a nearly eighty-year struggle for self-determination. Drawing on twenty-two months of ethnographic fieldwork (2016–2018) conducted in the capital city of Srinagar amid and in the aftermath of the indefinite strike, I show how the strike and the suspension of daily life it entailed was sustained through novel spatiotemporal techniques that coordinated and routinized the actions of the Kashmiri public. Yet sustaining the strike was not only defined by routine and self-restraint. Instead, as the article demonstrates, certain forms of financial labor, too, prolonged the strike—but they did so, counterintuitively, by breaking it. I focus in particular on Kashmiri bank employees, who were at times seen as betraying the strike, but who described their continued work during strike hours as essential for keeping the economy and hence society running. By emphasizing bank employees' liminal position of breaking the strike while supporting the cause of Kashmiri self-determination, I highlight the labor, sacrifice, and ambivalence that sustain—and threaten to unravel—political mobilizations.

Abstract Image

如何维持罢工:克什米尔的规则、惯例和必要条件
本文考察了印控克什米尔地区2016-2017年的总罢工(hartal或bandh),这里是近80年来争取自决的地方。在无限期罢工期间和之后,我在首都斯利那加进行了为期22个月的民族志田野调查(2016-2018),我展示了罢工和日常生活的暂停是如何通过新颖的时空技术来维持的,这些技术协调和常规化了克什米尔公众的行动。然而,持续罢工不仅仅是例行公事和自我克制。相反,正如文章所论证的那样,某些形式的金融劳动也延长了罢工时间——但与直觉相反,他们破坏了罢工。我特别关注克什米尔的银行员工,他们有时被视为背叛了罢工,但他们说,他们在罢工期间继续工作,对保持经济乃至社会的运转至关重要。通过强调银行员工在支持克什米尔民族自决的同时打破罢工的极限立场,我强调了维持政治动员的劳动、牺牲和矛盾心理,并威胁着政治动员的瓦解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cultural Anthropology
Cultural Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Cultural Anthropology publishes ethnographic writing informed by a wide array of theoretical perspectives, innovative in form and content, and focused on both traditional and emerging topics. It also welcomes essays concerned with ethnographic methods and research design in historical perspective, and with ways cultural analysis can address broader public audiences and interests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信