Stimulating individual learning of the concept of fraction equivalence: How students utilize adaptive features in digital learning environments mediates their effect
Maria-Martine Oppmann , Maik Beege , Frank Reinhold
{"title":"Stimulating individual learning of the concept of fraction equivalence: How students utilize adaptive features in digital learning environments mediates their effect","authors":"Maria-Martine Oppmann , Maik Beege , Frank Reinhold","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Students face challenges when learning fractions. To support students' understanding of equivalent fractions, adaptive support can provide a variety of benefits. The purpose of this study is to utilize real-time process data to tailor students’ individual learning experience with adaptive support. We propose a mediation model to explain the positive effect of such adaptive features on learning outcomes by increased student engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We conducted a 90-min RCT with a total of <em>N</em> <em>=</em> 300 sixth-grade students. Learning about equivalent fractions, an experimental group used an adaptive digital learning environment for practice. A control group used an equivalent non-adaptive, paper-based learning environment to practice the same tasks. Our hypothesis was that the two conditions showed different engagement during practice—explaining differences in learning outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results and discussion</h3><div>Results were in line with our mediation hypothesis: Using cluster analysis, we identified six user-profiles of students with differing behavioral and cognitive engagement during practice—utilizing process data (i.e., number of tasks and accuracy of solved tasks per difficulty level). These profiles were associated with different levels of perceived autonomy and competence support and perceived overload—and consequently learning outcomes. We also found a significant indirect mediation effect, emphasizing our hypothesis that adaptive support positively influences learning outcomes through its positive influence on students’ actual engagement during classroom practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 102118"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000428","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Students face challenges when learning fractions. To support students' understanding of equivalent fractions, adaptive support can provide a variety of benefits. The purpose of this study is to utilize real-time process data to tailor students’ individual learning experience with adaptive support. We propose a mediation model to explain the positive effect of such adaptive features on learning outcomes by increased student engagement.
Method
We conducted a 90-min RCT with a total of N= 300 sixth-grade students. Learning about equivalent fractions, an experimental group used an adaptive digital learning environment for practice. A control group used an equivalent non-adaptive, paper-based learning environment to practice the same tasks. Our hypothesis was that the two conditions showed different engagement during practice—explaining differences in learning outcomes.
Results and discussion
Results were in line with our mediation hypothesis: Using cluster analysis, we identified six user-profiles of students with differing behavioral and cognitive engagement during practice—utilizing process data (i.e., number of tasks and accuracy of solved tasks per difficulty level). These profiles were associated with different levels of perceived autonomy and competence support and perceived overload—and consequently learning outcomes. We also found a significant indirect mediation effect, emphasizing our hypothesis that adaptive support positively influences learning outcomes through its positive influence on students’ actual engagement during classroom practice.
期刊介绍:
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.