Chen Chen , Andrew Cohen , Qiqi Liang , Licheng Sun
{"title":"Maxing out short-term reversals in weekly stock returns","authors":"Chen Chen , Andrew Cohen , Qiqi Liang , Licheng Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jempfin.2025.101608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Subrahmanyam (1991) presents a model in which increased variance in liquidity trades reduces price efficiency when market makers are risk-averse. Motivated by this theoretical insight, we hypothesize that pent-up demand from lottery-seeking investors amplifies their overreactions to news, leading to larger short-term return reversals. Consistent with this hypothesis, we identify a significant pattern in weekly U.S. stock returns for lottery-like stocks, defined by high recent maximum daily returns (MAX). Specifically, high-MAX stocks that were past 1-week losers (or winners) exhibit notably positive (or negative) returns in the following week. Applying a short-term reversal strategy to high-MAX stocks generates an average weekly return of 1.66%, significantly outperforming the 0.65% return from the same strategy applied to low-MAX stocks. This result remains robust even after controlling for market microstructure biases and survives a series of robustness tests. Interestingly, the MAX-enhanced reversal strategy proves effective only when retail order imbalance is in the highest quintile. This result holds across both value-weighted and equal-weighted portfolios, underscoring the pivotal role of retail investors. Taken together, our findings highlight a new channel through which retail investors’ preference for lottery-like payoffs amplifies their overreactions, enhancing the profitability of short-term reversal strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Finance","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 101608"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Empirical Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539825000301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Subrahmanyam (1991) presents a model in which increased variance in liquidity trades reduces price efficiency when market makers are risk-averse. Motivated by this theoretical insight, we hypothesize that pent-up demand from lottery-seeking investors amplifies their overreactions to news, leading to larger short-term return reversals. Consistent with this hypothesis, we identify a significant pattern in weekly U.S. stock returns for lottery-like stocks, defined by high recent maximum daily returns (MAX). Specifically, high-MAX stocks that were past 1-week losers (or winners) exhibit notably positive (or negative) returns in the following week. Applying a short-term reversal strategy to high-MAX stocks generates an average weekly return of 1.66%, significantly outperforming the 0.65% return from the same strategy applied to low-MAX stocks. This result remains robust even after controlling for market microstructure biases and survives a series of robustness tests. Interestingly, the MAX-enhanced reversal strategy proves effective only when retail order imbalance is in the highest quintile. This result holds across both value-weighted and equal-weighted portfolios, underscoring the pivotal role of retail investors. Taken together, our findings highlight a new channel through which retail investors’ preference for lottery-like payoffs amplifies their overreactions, enhancing the profitability of short-term reversal strategies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Empirical Finance is a financial economics journal whose aim is to publish high quality articles in empirical finance. Empirical finance is interpreted broadly to include any type of empirical work in financial economics, financial econometrics, and also theoretical work with clear empirical implications, even when there is no empirical analysis. The Journal welcomes articles in all fields of finance, such as asset pricing, corporate finance, financial econometrics, banking, international finance, microstructure, behavioural finance, etc. The Editorial Team is willing to take risks on innovative research, controversial papers, and unusual approaches. We are also particularly interested in work produced by young scholars. The composition of the editorial board reflects such goals.