Does quality matter? Examining the influence of product quality and source on Japanese beef imports

IF 4.8 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Christina G. Slater , Andrew Muhammad , Karen L. DeLong
{"title":"Does quality matter? Examining the influence of product quality and source on Japanese beef imports","authors":"Christina G. Slater ,&nbsp;Andrew Muhammad ,&nbsp;Karen L. DeLong","doi":"10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Product quality is essential, as it influences consumer preferences and, hence, affects imports. In this study, we employed a demand system framework to estimate source-differentiated beef demand in Japan. Additionally, we evaluated whether the quality attributes of chilled versus frozen beef were significant in explaining trade flows. Using quarterly trade data, we estimated Japanese beef demand by exporting source (e.g., Australia, U.S.) and product quality (chilled and frozen). We used different models based on assumptions about quality (unrestricted, quality aggregated, and quality separability) and compared the demand estimates and resulting elasticities across models. The importance of quality was also verified by separability and aggregation likelihood-ratio tests.</div><div>Results indicate that quality matters. In fact, likelihood-ratio tests indicate that preferences for chilled and frozen beef may even be independent. That is, the demand for chilled beef imports could be estimated separately from frozen beef imports. However, resulting elasticity estimates did not significantly differ when quality attributes were considered, except for U.S. chilled beef where the own-price elasticity was statistically different between the unrestricted model (−0.4) and quality-aggregated model (−1.2). However, we found no significant difference between the elasticities from the quality-separability and quality-aggregated models regardless of source. Results provide insights into Japanese beef import demand, which is important considering Japan is the third largest beef importer in the world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 101857"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154325002285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Product quality is essential, as it influences consumer preferences and, hence, affects imports. In this study, we employed a demand system framework to estimate source-differentiated beef demand in Japan. Additionally, we evaluated whether the quality attributes of chilled versus frozen beef were significant in explaining trade flows. Using quarterly trade data, we estimated Japanese beef demand by exporting source (e.g., Australia, U.S.) and product quality (chilled and frozen). We used different models based on assumptions about quality (unrestricted, quality aggregated, and quality separability) and compared the demand estimates and resulting elasticities across models. The importance of quality was also verified by separability and aggregation likelihood-ratio tests.
Results indicate that quality matters. In fact, likelihood-ratio tests indicate that preferences for chilled and frozen beef may even be independent. That is, the demand for chilled beef imports could be estimated separately from frozen beef imports. However, resulting elasticity estimates did not significantly differ when quality attributes were considered, except for U.S. chilled beef where the own-price elasticity was statistically different between the unrestricted model (−0.4) and quality-aggregated model (−1.2). However, we found no significant difference between the elasticities from the quality-separability and quality-aggregated models regardless of source. Results provide insights into Japanese beef import demand, which is important considering Japan is the third largest beef importer in the world.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
193
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信