Chemical Fingerprints Combined with Chemometric Analysis to Evaluate and Distinguish Between Plantago Asiatica L. and Plantago Depressa Willd.

Guoqiang Liu, Zicheng Ma, Jinli Wen, Xiaoran Zhao, Yanru Deng, Lili Sun, Xiaoliang Ren
{"title":"Chemical Fingerprints Combined with Chemometric Analysis to Evaluate and Distinguish Between Plantago Asiatica L. and Plantago Depressa Willd.","authors":"Guoqiang Liu, Zicheng Ma, Jinli Wen, Xiaoran Zhao, Yanru Deng, Lili Sun, Xiaoliang Ren","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plantago, also known as plantain, has been used as a traditional herb in Asia for centuries to treat urinary tract inflammation and kidney disease. Recently, there has been increasing interest in its potential applications in the food industry. In China, there are two common species, namely Plantago asiatica L. (PAL) and P. depressa Willd. (PDW), which are not distinguished in folk and clinical practices, leading to safety and efficacy risks in plantago applications.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to establish a reliable method for differentiating and evaluating the quality of PAL and PDW by integrating fingerprint analysis with multivariate chemometrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HPLC was used to collect characteristic chemical information from the whole plant in 13 PAL and 18 PDW samples, establishing fingerprints for the different species. Multiple chemometric methods, including hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), principal component analysis (PCA), and partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), were employed to analyze the chemical differences between the two species and to identify chemical markers. Finally, the differences in the content of the three chemical markers in the two plantago samples were determined and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed a distinct classification of PAL and PDW into two groups. Significant differences were observed in the content of key components such as plantamajoside, acteoside, and isoacteoside between the two species.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides a reliable scientific basis for the rational application and quality evaluation of plantago. The findings contribute to ensuring the safe and effective use of plantago in various applications.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>HPLC fingerprinting combined with chemometrics identified three key markers distinguishing PAL and PDW, supporting quality control and medicinal development.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":"479-487"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Plantago, also known as plantain, has been used as a traditional herb in Asia for centuries to treat urinary tract inflammation and kidney disease. Recently, there has been increasing interest in its potential applications in the food industry. In China, there are two common species, namely Plantago asiatica L. (PAL) and P. depressa Willd. (PDW), which are not distinguished in folk and clinical practices, leading to safety and efficacy risks in plantago applications.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to establish a reliable method for differentiating and evaluating the quality of PAL and PDW by integrating fingerprint analysis with multivariate chemometrics.

Methods: HPLC was used to collect characteristic chemical information from the whole plant in 13 PAL and 18 PDW samples, establishing fingerprints for the different species. Multiple chemometric methods, including hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), principal component analysis (PCA), and partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), were employed to analyze the chemical differences between the two species and to identify chemical markers. Finally, the differences in the content of the three chemical markers in the two plantago samples were determined and analyzed.

Results: The analysis revealed a distinct classification of PAL and PDW into two groups. Significant differences were observed in the content of key components such as plantamajoside, acteoside, and isoacteoside between the two species.

Conclusion: This study provides a reliable scientific basis for the rational application and quality evaluation of plantago. The findings contribute to ensuring the safe and effective use of plantago in various applications.

Highlights: HPLC fingerprinting combined with chemometrics identified three key markers distinguishing PAL and PDW, supporting quality control and medicinal development.

化学指纹图谱结合化学计量学分析评价和区分车前草和大车前草。
背景:车前草,也被称为车前草,在亚洲作为一种传统草药已经使用了几个世纪,用于治疗尿路炎症和肾脏疾病。近年来,人们对其在食品工业中的潜在应用越来越感兴趣。在中国,车前草(Plantago asiatica L., PAL)和车前草(P. depressa wild, PDW)是车前草的两种常见品种,在民间和临床实践中未加以区分,导致车前草应用存在安全性和有效性风险。目的:将指纹分析与多元化学计量学相结合,建立一种可靠的鉴别和评价PAL和PDW质量的方法。方法:首先,采用高效液相色谱法采集13株PAL和18株PDW全株样品的化学特征信息,建立不同品种的指纹图谱;采用层次聚类分析(HCA)、主成分分析(PCA)和偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)等多种化学计量学方法分析两种植物的化学差异,并鉴定化学标记。最后,对两种车前草样品中3种化学标记物含量的差异进行了测定和分析。结果:分析显示PAL和PDW可分为两组。两种植物在车前草皂苷、毛蕊花苷、异毛蕊花苷等关键成分含量上存在显著差异。结论:本研究为车前草的合理应用和质量评价提供了可靠的科学依据。研究结果有助于确保车前草在各种应用中的安全有效利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信