Enhanced elastoplasticity-based frictional-collisional model for solid–fluid phase transition of granular media

IF 5.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Hang Feng , Zhen-Yu Yin
{"title":"Enhanced elastoplasticity-based frictional-collisional model for solid–fluid phase transition of granular media","authors":"Hang Feng ,&nbsp;Zhen-Yu Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurately describing the solid-like and fluid-like behaviors of granular media is crucial in geotechnical engineering. While the unified frictional-collisional model, integrating rate-independent frictional and rate-dependent collisional stresses, is widely used for solid–fluid phase transitions, an effective model is still under investigation, and comprehensive analyses are lacking. This study addresses these gaps by developing an enhanced elastoplasticity-based frictional-collisional model. The frictional stress is modeled using a critical-state-based elastoplasticity approach, and the collisional stress is formulated through an enhanced kinetic theory incorporating particle stiffness. Subsequently, comprehensive element simulations are conducted to explore the effects of concentration, particle stiffness, and strain rate paths on the model. The proposed model’s effectiveness is also validated against experimental data. Finally, a detailed comparison with the typical <em>μ</em>(I) rheology model and a state-equation-based phase transition model is conducted. Our analyses show that the developed model effectively captures strain rate path and particle stiffness through the collisional stress component, while concentration-dependent characteristics are captured through both frictional and collisional stress components. Through comparative analyses, we also found that both the state-equation-based and elastoplasticity-based models depict solid-like behavior and replicate the rheology of granular media in a fluid-like state, similar to the <em>μ</em>(I) model. However, they differ in implementing critical state theory: the state-equation-based model acts as a partial-range phase transition model, describing stress evolution from the critical state to the fluid-like state, while the proposed elastoplasticity-based model serves as a full-range phase transition model, covering stress evolution from the initial to the fluid-like state.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55217,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Geotechnics","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 107218"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X25001673","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately describing the solid-like and fluid-like behaviors of granular media is crucial in geotechnical engineering. While the unified frictional-collisional model, integrating rate-independent frictional and rate-dependent collisional stresses, is widely used for solid–fluid phase transitions, an effective model is still under investigation, and comprehensive analyses are lacking. This study addresses these gaps by developing an enhanced elastoplasticity-based frictional-collisional model. The frictional stress is modeled using a critical-state-based elastoplasticity approach, and the collisional stress is formulated through an enhanced kinetic theory incorporating particle stiffness. Subsequently, comprehensive element simulations are conducted to explore the effects of concentration, particle stiffness, and strain rate paths on the model. The proposed model’s effectiveness is also validated against experimental data. Finally, a detailed comparison with the typical μ(I) rheology model and a state-equation-based phase transition model is conducted. Our analyses show that the developed model effectively captures strain rate path and particle stiffness through the collisional stress component, while concentration-dependent characteristics are captured through both frictional and collisional stress components. Through comparative analyses, we also found that both the state-equation-based and elastoplasticity-based models depict solid-like behavior and replicate the rheology of granular media in a fluid-like state, similar to the μ(I) model. However, they differ in implementing critical state theory: the state-equation-based model acts as a partial-range phase transition model, describing stress evolution from the critical state to the fluid-like state, while the proposed elastoplasticity-based model serves as a full-range phase transition model, covering stress evolution from the initial to the fluid-like state.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers and Geotechnics
Computers and Geotechnics 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
438
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The use of computers is firmly established in geotechnical engineering and continues to grow rapidly in both engineering practice and academe. The development of advanced numerical techniques and constitutive modeling, in conjunction with rapid developments in computer hardware, enables problems to be tackled that were unthinkable even a few years ago. Computers and Geotechnics provides an up-to-date reference for engineers and researchers engaged in computer aided analysis and research in geotechnical engineering. The journal is intended for an expeditious dissemination of advanced computer applications across a broad range of geotechnical topics. Contributions on advances in numerical algorithms, computer implementation of new constitutive models and probabilistic methods are especially encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信