Nurses Perspectives on Low-Dose Methadone for Pain in Nursing Homes: Semi-structured Interviews.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jennifer Holler O'Brien, Caroline Baldwin, Jenica Burns, Amber Kleckner, Takeshi Uemura
{"title":"Nurses Perspectives on Low-Dose Methadone for Pain in Nursing Homes: Semi-structured Interviews.","authors":"Jennifer Holler O'Brien, Caroline Baldwin, Jenica Burns, Amber Kleckner, Takeshi Uemura","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Chronic pain is prevalent in nursing homes, yet safe and effective long-acting opioid options are limited. Studies suggest that low-dose methadone (LDM) may be an ideal alternative. However, its use in nursing homes remains rare and perspectives from nursing staff on its practical benefits and challenges are underreported. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To explore nurses' perspectives on LDM for pain in nursing home residents and assess potential benefits and barriers to its adoption. <b><i>Design:</i></b> A qualitative study employing semi-structured interviews and a modified phenomenological approach. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> Nurses who administered LDM (<10 mg/day) as the primary opioid for pain in the past three years in Hawaii and British Columbia nursing homes. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom™ using a standardized interview guide. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a qualitative description approach. Data collection continued until thematic saturation was reached. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 11 nurse participants, most reported that LDM was effective in managing pain without major side effects, even in cases where other opioids had failed, and observed improvements in resident behavior. Four key themes emerged: initial hesitancy and the role of education, effectiveness in pain control, preferable side effect profile, and pros and cons of administration. Participants noted that LDM's long-acting nature and liquid formulation were particularly beneficial in nursing home settings. Additionally, the use of LDM appeared to alleviate their workload by improving resident cooperation and reducing the need for frequent medication administration. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> LDM is effective and well-tolerated for pain management in nursing home residents, with minimal side effects and added benefits for resident behavior and nurse satisfaction. These findings support the need for further studies to assess LDM's utility in nursing home settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0551","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain is prevalent in nursing homes, yet safe and effective long-acting opioid options are limited. Studies suggest that low-dose methadone (LDM) may be an ideal alternative. However, its use in nursing homes remains rare and perspectives from nursing staff on its practical benefits and challenges are underreported. Objectives: To explore nurses' perspectives on LDM for pain in nursing home residents and assess potential benefits and barriers to its adoption. Design: A qualitative study employing semi-structured interviews and a modified phenomenological approach. Setting/Subjects: Nurses who administered LDM (<10 mg/day) as the primary opioid for pain in the past three years in Hawaii and British Columbia nursing homes. Measurements: Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom™ using a standardized interview guide. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a qualitative description approach. Data collection continued until thematic saturation was reached. Results: Of the 11 nurse participants, most reported that LDM was effective in managing pain without major side effects, even in cases where other opioids had failed, and observed improvements in resident behavior. Four key themes emerged: initial hesitancy and the role of education, effectiveness in pain control, preferable side effect profile, and pros and cons of administration. Participants noted that LDM's long-acting nature and liquid formulation were particularly beneficial in nursing home settings. Additionally, the use of LDM appeared to alleviate their workload by improving resident cooperation and reducing the need for frequent medication administration. Conclusions: LDM is effective and well-tolerated for pain management in nursing home residents, with minimal side effects and added benefits for resident behavior and nurse satisfaction. These findings support the need for further studies to assess LDM's utility in nursing home settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信