Navigating neurodivergence: A scoping review to guide health professions educators.

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Laura Gray, Bryony McNeill, Laura Pecora, Susie Macfarlane, Alexa Hayley, Danielle Hitch, Sherryn Evans
{"title":"Navigating neurodivergence: A scoping review to guide health professions educators.","authors":"Laura Gray, Bryony McNeill, Laura Pecora, Susie Macfarlane, Alexa Hayley, Danielle Hitch, Sherryn Evans","doi":"10.1111/medu.15676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To create inclusive learning environments where neurodivergent students can learn and thrive, educators must appreciate their unique perspectives and experiences. This is particularly crucial in health professions courses, where students may face additional pressures as they undertake placements in clinical environments where neurodivergence is misrepresented or misunderstood. A comprehensive review of the existing literature is necessary to identify the available data to guide educators and pinpoint areas that warrant further exploration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scoping review methodology, informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute approach, was used to guide a search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINHAL, ERIC and PsycINFO), considering sources of primary data and analysis published up to June 2024. The retrieved literature was screened based on the inclusion criteria. Bibliographic data was extracted, and the included papers (n = 69) were reviewed and the themes charted using a framework approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the included literature indicated some clear trends over time, with earlier papers predominantly focussing on dyslexia or framing neurodiverg as a form of disability. More recently there has been an increase in the number of papers specifically exploring the experiences of students identifying as neurodivergent, or the perspectives of educators. Narratives evident in the literature centred around relationships between a neurodivergent identity and a developing professional identity, challenges around disclosure, seeking effective accommodations in a stigmatising environment and the impact of educator perspectives.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the framing of neurodivergence has changed over time, a consistent finding is that neurodivergent students in health professions programmes are expected to conform to learning environments that exclude them and do not support their learning. Further evidence is required to inform recommendations for educators on how to provide safer learning environments which enable neurodivergent students to thrive.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15676","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To create inclusive learning environments where neurodivergent students can learn and thrive, educators must appreciate their unique perspectives and experiences. This is particularly crucial in health professions courses, where students may face additional pressures as they undertake placements in clinical environments where neurodivergence is misrepresented or misunderstood. A comprehensive review of the existing literature is necessary to identify the available data to guide educators and pinpoint areas that warrant further exploration.

Methods: Scoping review methodology, informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute approach, was used to guide a search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINHAL, ERIC and PsycINFO), considering sources of primary data and analysis published up to June 2024. The retrieved literature was screened based on the inclusion criteria. Bibliographic data was extracted, and the included papers (n = 69) were reviewed and the themes charted using a framework approach.

Results: Analysis of the included literature indicated some clear trends over time, with earlier papers predominantly focussing on dyslexia or framing neurodiverg as a form of disability. More recently there has been an increase in the number of papers specifically exploring the experiences of students identifying as neurodivergent, or the perspectives of educators. Narratives evident in the literature centred around relationships between a neurodivergent identity and a developing professional identity, challenges around disclosure, seeking effective accommodations in a stigmatising environment and the impact of educator perspectives.

Discussion: Although the framing of neurodivergence has changed over time, a consistent finding is that neurodivergent students in health professions programmes are expected to conform to learning environments that exclude them and do not support their learning. Further evidence is required to inform recommendations for educators on how to provide safer learning environments which enable neurodivergent students to thrive.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信