Emily Lynn McNicol, Bethel Osuagwu, Aleksandra Vučković
{"title":"Task-dependent frequency of intermuscular coherence in the presence of transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation: a feasibility study.","authors":"Emily Lynn McNicol, Bethel Osuagwu, Aleksandra Vučković","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2025.1556325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The task-dependent frequency of common neural drive to muscles has important applications for motor rehabilitation therapies. While it is well established that muscle dynamics influence the synchronicity of neural drive, the modulation of this coherence between static and dynamic movements remains unclear. Transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (TESCS) is believed to enhance spinal cord excitability, potentially improving brain-muscle communication; however, its effect on common neural drive to muscles has not yet been reported. This study aimed to investigate differences in intermuscular coherence (IMC) frequency between static and dynamic movement tasks and determine whether it is feasible to enhance it by TESCS. Participants performed static and dynamic hand grip tasks at different timepoints with respect to stimulation, set to 80% tolerable intensity. Surface EMG signals were recorded from the <i>flexor digitorum superficialis</i> (FDS) and <i>extensor digitorum communis</i> (EDC) muscles during each trial to determine beta- (15-30 Hz) and gamma- (30-48 Hz) band intermuscular coherence. The sum of IMC (<i>IMC</i> <sub><i>area</i></sub> ) was significantly greater (<i>p</i> <sub><i>B</i></sub> = 0.018, <i>p</i> <sub><i>D</i></sub> = 0.0183, <i>p</i> <sub><i>IM</i></sub> = 0.0172, <i>p</i> <sub>5</sub> = 0.0206, <i>p</i> <sub>10</sub> = 0.0183, <i>p</i> <sub>15</sub> = 0.0172) in the gamma-band for the dynamic task compared to the static task at every timepoint (before TESCS, during TESCS and immediately, 5-min, 10-min, and 15-min after TESCS) which may reflect a mechanism of increased efficiency of corticospinal interactions and could have implications for the types of movements that should be performed while receiving TESCS. There was no immediate measurable effect of TESCS on <i>IMC</i> <sub><i>area</i></sub> at any timepoint in the beta-band (<i>p</i> = 0.25, <i>p</i> = 0.31) or gamma-band (<i>p</i> = 0.52, <i>p</i> = 0.73) for either the static or dynamic task respectively. This could be explained by corticospinal networks already working at maximum capacity in able-bodied individuals or that a longer duration of TESCS is required to elicit a measurable effect. While the intra-task difference in beta- and gamma-band <i>IMC</i> <sub><i>area</i></sub> between static and dynamic tasks was statistically significant (<i>p</i> <sub><i>IM</i></sub> = 0.0275, <i>p</i> <sub>5</sub> = 0.0275, <i>p</i> <sub>15</sub> = 0.0031) at timepoints after stimulation, we did not find direct evidence that TESCS influenced this beta-gamma interaction. Thus, further investigation is needed to establish any causal relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1556325"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1556325","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The task-dependent frequency of common neural drive to muscles has important applications for motor rehabilitation therapies. While it is well established that muscle dynamics influence the synchronicity of neural drive, the modulation of this coherence between static and dynamic movements remains unclear. Transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (TESCS) is believed to enhance spinal cord excitability, potentially improving brain-muscle communication; however, its effect on common neural drive to muscles has not yet been reported. This study aimed to investigate differences in intermuscular coherence (IMC) frequency between static and dynamic movement tasks and determine whether it is feasible to enhance it by TESCS. Participants performed static and dynamic hand grip tasks at different timepoints with respect to stimulation, set to 80% tolerable intensity. Surface EMG signals were recorded from the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC) muscles during each trial to determine beta- (15-30 Hz) and gamma- (30-48 Hz) band intermuscular coherence. The sum of IMC (IMCarea ) was significantly greater (pB = 0.018, pD = 0.0183, pIM = 0.0172, p5 = 0.0206, p10 = 0.0183, p15 = 0.0172) in the gamma-band for the dynamic task compared to the static task at every timepoint (before TESCS, during TESCS and immediately, 5-min, 10-min, and 15-min after TESCS) which may reflect a mechanism of increased efficiency of corticospinal interactions and could have implications for the types of movements that should be performed while receiving TESCS. There was no immediate measurable effect of TESCS on IMCarea at any timepoint in the beta-band (p = 0.25, p = 0.31) or gamma-band (p = 0.52, p = 0.73) for either the static or dynamic task respectively. This could be explained by corticospinal networks already working at maximum capacity in able-bodied individuals or that a longer duration of TESCS is required to elicit a measurable effect. While the intra-task difference in beta- and gamma-band IMCarea between static and dynamic tasks was statistically significant (pIM = 0.0275, p5 = 0.0275, p15 = 0.0031) at timepoints after stimulation, we did not find direct evidence that TESCS influenced this beta-gamma interaction. Thus, further investigation is needed to establish any causal relationship.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.