Diagnostic accuracy of MUAC for assessment of acute malnutrition among children aged 6-59 months in Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Frontiers in Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnut.2025.1536386
Yonatan Menber, Tefera Belachew, Netsanet Fentahun
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of MUAC for assessment of acute malnutrition among children aged 6-59 months in Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yonatan Menber, Tefera Belachew, Netsanet Fentahun","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2025.1536386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) or Weight-for-Length Z-Score (WHZ) are used to screen for acute malnutrition in children. The relative merits of MUAC and WHZ, as well as whether they ought to be used separately, are still up for debate. Considering the significant impact of acute malnutrition on a large number of children in Africa, along with the constraints on resources, it is crucial to critically assess the validity of simple and widely used tools utilized in both African communities and clinical settings. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of MUAC in screening acute malnutrition among children aged 6-59 months in Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted to pool evidence on the diagnostic performance of MUAC compared to WHZ among children aged 6 to 59 months across various studies in Africa. The StataMP 17.0 software was utilized for analysis, employing a Bivariate Random-effects Meta-Analysis model. Sensitivity, specificity, the Diagnostic Odds Ratio, and the Area Under the Curve were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q statistic and the I<sup>2</sup> test. Additionally, meta-regression, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and assessments for publication bias were employed. The overall level of diagnostic test accuracy was estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 38.1% (95% CI: 30.7, 46.1%) and 94.9% (95% CI: 93.2, 96.2%), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve plot showed that MUAC had good accuracy in detecting acute malnutrition (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.88). The pooled level of diagnostic odds ratio was 13.22 (95% CI: 9.68, 16.77). The rate of misclassification in screening for acute malnutrition using MUAC was observed to be 11.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MUAC demonstrated low sensitivity but high specificity in diagnosing acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months across various regions of Africa. Furthermore, it was found that MUAC provides good diagnostic test accuracy when compared to WHZ. To enhance its accuracy, it is suggested to increase the MUAC cutoff thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":"12 ","pages":"1536386"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1536386","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) or Weight-for-Length Z-Score (WHZ) are used to screen for acute malnutrition in children. The relative merits of MUAC and WHZ, as well as whether they ought to be used separately, are still up for debate. Considering the significant impact of acute malnutrition on a large number of children in Africa, along with the constraints on resources, it is crucial to critically assess the validity of simple and widely used tools utilized in both African communities and clinical settings. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of MUAC in screening acute malnutrition among children aged 6-59 months in Africa.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted to pool evidence on the diagnostic performance of MUAC compared to WHZ among children aged 6 to 59 months across various studies in Africa. The StataMP 17.0 software was utilized for analysis, employing a Bivariate Random-effects Meta-Analysis model. Sensitivity, specificity, the Diagnostic Odds Ratio, and the Area Under the Curve were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q statistic and the I2 test. Additionally, meta-regression, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and assessments for publication bias were employed. The overall level of diagnostic test accuracy was estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis model.

Results: Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 38.1% (95% CI: 30.7, 46.1%) and 94.9% (95% CI: 93.2, 96.2%), respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve plot showed that MUAC had good accuracy in detecting acute malnutrition (AUC = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.88). The pooled level of diagnostic odds ratio was 13.22 (95% CI: 9.68, 16.77). The rate of misclassification in screening for acute malnutrition using MUAC was observed to be 11.7%.

Conclusion: The MUAC demonstrated low sensitivity but high specificity in diagnosing acute malnutrition in children aged 6 to 59 months across various regions of Africa. Furthermore, it was found that MUAC provides good diagnostic test accuracy when compared to WHZ. To enhance its accuracy, it is suggested to increase the MUAC cutoff thresholds.

背景:中上臂围(MUAC)或身长比体重 Z 值(WHZ)用于筛查儿童急性营养不良。关于中上臂围和身长比 Z 值的相对优点以及是否应分开使用,目前仍有争议。考虑到急性营养不良对非洲大量儿童的重大影响以及资源的限制,批判性地评估非洲社区和临床环境中广泛使用的简单工具的有效性至关重要。因此,本研究旨在评估 MUAC 在筛查非洲 6-59 个月大儿童急性营养不良方面的诊断测试准确性:我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析研究,以汇集非洲各种研究中有关 6 至 59 个月儿童中 MUAC 与 WHZ 相比诊断性能的证据。研究使用StataMP 17.0软件进行分析,并采用了双变量随机效应荟萃分析模型。计算了灵敏度、特异性、诊断率比和曲线下面积。使用 Cochrane's Q 统计量和 I2 检验评估异质性。此外,还采用了元回归、亚组分析、敏感性分析和出版偏倚评估。使用随机效应荟萃分析模型估算了诊断测试准确性的总体水平:17项研究被纳入荟萃分析。汇总的灵敏度和特异性分别为 38.1%(95% CI:30.7,46.1%)和 94.9%(95% CI:93.2,96.2%)。接受者操作特征曲线图显示,MUAC 在检测急性营养不良方面具有良好的准确性(AUC = 0.85,95% CI:0.82,0.88)。诊断几率比为 13.22(95% CI:9.68,16.77)。使用 MUAC 筛查急性营养不良的误诊率为 11.7%:结论:在非洲不同地区,MUAC 在诊断 6 至 59 个月儿童急性营养不良方面的灵敏度较低,但特异性较高。此外,研究还发现,与 WHZ 相比,MUAC 可提供良好的诊断测试准确性。为提高其准确性,建议提高 MUAC 临界值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Nutrition
Frontiers in Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
2891
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health. Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信