Rethinking Screening, and Considering Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences in the Clinical Presentation of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID): A Commentary Building Upon Presseller et al. (2024).

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Sandra Mulkens
{"title":"Rethinking Screening, and Considering Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences in the Clinical Presentation of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID): A Commentary Building Upon Presseller et al. (2024).","authors":"Sandra Mulkens","doi":"10.1002/eat.24428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is increasingly recognized globally, yet its clinical presentation may vary across cultures. This commentary highlights the importance of considering cultural context in the assessment of ARFID. We begin by reflecting on a study by Presseller et al. which examines the utility of the nine-item ARFID screen (NIAS) in a large Swedish sample, finding that the NIAS alone may not adequately differentiate ARFID from eating disorders driven by shape/weight concerns. Building upon this, we broaden the discussion to include the potential comorbidity of ARFID and other eating disorders driven by weight/shape concern, which also requires additional assessment. Furthermore, we explore potential cross-cultural similarities and differences in ARFID presentation, drawing on clinical experience in the Netherlands, Europe, and globally. Factors such as cultural norms surrounding eating, the acceptability of expressing feeding difficulties, and food availability itself may all influence how ARFID manifests. A deeper understanding of these cultural nuances is essential for accurate diagnosis, culturally sensitive treatment approaches, and ultimately, improved outcomes for individuals with ARFID worldwide. The nuanced interplay of cultural factors and diagnostic tools underscores the imperative for tailored approaches in addressing ARFID across diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is increasingly recognized globally, yet its clinical presentation may vary across cultures. This commentary highlights the importance of considering cultural context in the assessment of ARFID. We begin by reflecting on a study by Presseller et al. which examines the utility of the nine-item ARFID screen (NIAS) in a large Swedish sample, finding that the NIAS alone may not adequately differentiate ARFID from eating disorders driven by shape/weight concerns. Building upon this, we broaden the discussion to include the potential comorbidity of ARFID and other eating disorders driven by weight/shape concern, which also requires additional assessment. Furthermore, we explore potential cross-cultural similarities and differences in ARFID presentation, drawing on clinical experience in the Netherlands, Europe, and globally. Factors such as cultural norms surrounding eating, the acceptability of expressing feeding difficulties, and food availability itself may all influence how ARFID manifests. A deeper understanding of these cultural nuances is essential for accurate diagnosis, culturally sensitive treatment approaches, and ultimately, improved outcomes for individuals with ARFID worldwide. The nuanced interplay of cultural factors and diagnostic tools underscores the imperative for tailored approaches in addressing ARFID across diverse populations.

重新思考筛选,并考虑回避/限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)临床表现的跨文化异同:基于Presseller等人(2024)的评论。
回避/限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)在全球范围内得到越来越多的认可,但其临床表现可能因文化而异。这篇评论强调了在ARFID评估中考虑文化背景的重要性。我们首先回顾Presseller等人的一项研究,该研究在瑞典的一个大样本中检验了九项ARFID筛查(NIAS)的效用,发现仅凭NIAS可能无法充分区分ARFID与由体型/体重问题引起的饮食失调。在此基础上,我们扩大了讨论范围,包括ARFID和其他由体重/体型引起的饮食失调的潜在合并症,这也需要额外的评估。此外,我们利用荷兰、欧洲和全球的临床经验,探讨ARFID表现的潜在跨文化异同。诸如围绕饮食的文化规范、表达喂养困难的可接受性以及食物供应本身等因素都可能影响ARFID的表现。更深入地了解这些文化差异对于准确诊断、文化敏感的治疗方法以及最终改善全球ARFID患者的预后至关重要。文化因素和诊断工具的微妙相互作用强调了在不同人群中解决ARFID的量身定制方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信