The psychology of criminal authority: Introducing the Legitimacy of Secret Power Scale.

IF 4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1177/13684302241290935
Giovanni A Travaglino, Alberto Mirisola, Chanki Moon, Pascal Burgmer, Hirotaka Imada, Isabella Giammusso, Silvana D'Ottone, Kengo Nawata, Miki Ozeki, Dominic Abrams
{"title":"The psychology of criminal authority: Introducing the Legitimacy of Secret Power Scale.","authors":"Giovanni A Travaglino, Alberto Mirisola, Chanki Moon, Pascal Burgmer, Hirotaka Imada, Isabella Giammusso, Silvana D'Ottone, Kengo Nawata, Miki Ozeki, Dominic Abrams","doi":"10.1177/13684302241290935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The state's monopoly on sovereignty can be challenged by criminal systems capable of gaining legitimacy within communities. Understanding the psychological basis of such legitimacy requires broadening traditional conceptualizations of authority to consider how it operates without legal backing and outside formal channels. This research introduces the Legitimacy of Secret Power (L-SP) Scale, a tool measuring individuals' appraisal of illegal groups' power. We validated L-SP through three studies (<i>N</i> <sub>total</sub> = 3,173). Findings demonstrate a reliable, 20-item mono-factorial structure. Study 3 tested L-SP's measurement invariance in the UK, Italy, Japan, and the US. Across studies, L-SP correlated with support for illegality, ideologies of masculine honor, and social dominance. It was inversely related to the perceived national threat of criminal groups, democratic attitudes, and police legitimacy. Notably, L-SP predicted individuals' willingness to report criminal groups independently of their fear of these groups or perceptions of police legitimacy. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"28 3","pages":"477-503"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241290935","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The state's monopoly on sovereignty can be challenged by criminal systems capable of gaining legitimacy within communities. Understanding the psychological basis of such legitimacy requires broadening traditional conceptualizations of authority to consider how it operates without legal backing and outside formal channels. This research introduces the Legitimacy of Secret Power (L-SP) Scale, a tool measuring individuals' appraisal of illegal groups' power. We validated L-SP through three studies (N total = 3,173). Findings demonstrate a reliable, 20-item mono-factorial structure. Study 3 tested L-SP's measurement invariance in the UK, Italy, Japan, and the US. Across studies, L-SP correlated with support for illegality, ideologies of masculine honor, and social dominance. It was inversely related to the perceived national threat of criminal groups, democratic attitudes, and police legitimacy. Notably, L-SP predicted individuals' willingness to report criminal groups independently of their fear of these groups or perceptions of police legitimacy. Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.

刑事权威心理学:论秘密权力尺度的合法性。
国家对主权的垄断可能受到能够在社区内获得合法性的刑事制度的挑战。理解这种合法性的心理基础需要拓宽权威的传统概念,以考虑它如何在没有法律支持和正式渠道之外运作。本研究引入了一种测量个人对非法团体权力评价的工具——秘密权力合法性(L-SP)量表。我们通过3项研究(N总计= 3173)验证了L-SP。结果显示了一个可靠的20项单因子结构。研究3在英国、意大利、日本和美国测试了L-SP的测量不变性。在所有研究中,L-SP与支持非法行为、男性荣誉意识形态和社会支配相关。它与犯罪集团的国家威胁、民主态度和警察合法性呈负相关。值得注意的是,L-SP预测个人举报犯罪集团的意愿独立于他们对这些集团的恐惧或对警察合法性的看法。讨论了理论意义和未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Group Processes & Intergroup Relations is a scientific social psychology journal dedicated to research on social psychological processes within and between groups. It provides a forum for and is aimed at researchers and students in social psychology and related disciples (e.g., organizational and management sciences, political science, sociology, language and communication, cross cultural psychology, international relations) that have a scientific interest in the social psychology of human groups. The journal has an extensive editorial team that includes many if not most of the leading scholars in social psychology of group processes and intergroup relations from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信