Optic Nerve Crush Does Not Induce Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss in the Contralateral Eye.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Florianne E Schoot Uiterkamp, Margaret E Maes, Mohammad Amin Alamalhoda, Arsalan Firoozi, Gloria Colombo, Sandra Siegert
{"title":"Optic Nerve Crush Does Not Induce Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss in the Contralateral Eye.","authors":"Florianne E Schoot Uiterkamp, Margaret E Maes, Mohammad Amin Alamalhoda, Arsalan Firoozi, Gloria Colombo, Sandra Siegert","doi":"10.1167/iovs.66.3.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Optic nerve crush (ONC) is a model for studying optic nerve trauma. Unilateral ONC induces massive retinal ganglion cell (RGC) degeneration in the affected eye, leading to vision loss within a month. A common assumption has been that the non-injured contralateral eye is unaffected due to the minimal retino-retinal projections of the RGCs at the chiasm. Yet, recently, microglia, the brain-resident macrophages, have shown a responsive phenotype in the contralateral eye after ONC. Whether RGC loss accompanies this phenotype is still controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the available RGCode algorithm and developing our own RGC-Quant deep-learning-based tool, we quantify RGC's total number and density across the entire retina after ONC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We confirm a short-term microglia response in the contralateral eye after ONC, but this did not affect the microglia number. Furthermore, we cannot confirm the previously reported RGC loss between naïve and contralateral retinas 5 weeks after ONC induction across the commonly used Cx3cr1creERT2 and C57BL6/J mouse models. Neither sex nor the direct comparison of the RGC markers Brn3a and RBPMS, with Brn3a co-labeling, on average, 89% of the RBPMS+-cells, explained this discrepancy, suggesting that the early microglia-responsive phenotype does not have immediate consequences on the RGC number.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results corroborate that unilateral optic nerve injury elicits a microglial response in the uninjured contralateral eye but without RGC loss. Therefore, the contralateral eye should be treated separately and not as an ONC control.</p>","PeriodicalId":14620,"journal":{"name":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","volume":"66 3","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.3.49","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Optic nerve crush (ONC) is a model for studying optic nerve trauma. Unilateral ONC induces massive retinal ganglion cell (RGC) degeneration in the affected eye, leading to vision loss within a month. A common assumption has been that the non-injured contralateral eye is unaffected due to the minimal retino-retinal projections of the RGCs at the chiasm. Yet, recently, microglia, the brain-resident macrophages, have shown a responsive phenotype in the contralateral eye after ONC. Whether RGC loss accompanies this phenotype is still controversial.

Methods: Using the available RGCode algorithm and developing our own RGC-Quant deep-learning-based tool, we quantify RGC's total number and density across the entire retina after ONC.

Results: We confirm a short-term microglia response in the contralateral eye after ONC, but this did not affect the microglia number. Furthermore, we cannot confirm the previously reported RGC loss between naïve and contralateral retinas 5 weeks after ONC induction across the commonly used Cx3cr1creERT2 and C57BL6/J mouse models. Neither sex nor the direct comparison of the RGC markers Brn3a and RBPMS, with Brn3a co-labeling, on average, 89% of the RBPMS+-cells, explained this discrepancy, suggesting that the early microglia-responsive phenotype does not have immediate consequences on the RGC number.

Conclusions: Our results corroborate that unilateral optic nerve injury elicits a microglial response in the uninjured contralateral eye but without RGC loss. Therefore, the contralateral eye should be treated separately and not as an ONC control.

视神经压迫不会导致对侧眼视网膜神经节细胞丢失。
目的:视神经压迫(ONC)是研究视神经损伤的模型。单侧ONC在受影响的眼睛中诱导大量视网膜神经节细胞(RGC)变性,导致视力在一个月内丧失。一种常见的假设是,未受伤的对侧眼不受影响,因为在交叉处RGCs的视网膜-视网膜投影最小。然而,最近,脑内巨噬细胞小胶质细胞在ONC后对侧眼显示出响应表型。RGC丢失是否伴随这种表型仍然存在争议。方法:利用现有的RGCode算法和开发我们自己的基于RGC- quant深度学习的工具,我们量化了ONC后整个视网膜上的RGC总数和密度。结果:我们证实ONC后对侧眼有短期小胶质细胞反应,但这并不影响小胶质细胞数量。此外,在常用的Cx3cr1creERT2和C57BL6/J小鼠模型中,我们无法证实先前报道的在ONC诱导后5周naïve和对侧视网膜之间的RGC丢失。无论是性别还是RGC标记物Brn3a和RBPMS的直接比较,以及Brn3a共标记的RBPMS,平均而言,89%的RBPMS+细胞,都不能解释这种差异,这表明早期小胶质细胞反应表型对RGC数量没有直接影响。结论:我们的研究结果证实,单侧视神经损伤在未损伤的对侧眼引起小胶质细胞反应,但没有RGC丢失。因此,对侧眼应单独治疗,而不是作为ONC对照。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
339
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS), published as ready online, is a peer-reviewed academic journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). IOVS features original research, mostly pertaining to clinical and laboratory ophthalmology and vision research in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信