Genetic algorithm-optimized artificial neural network for multi-objective optimization of biomass and exopolysaccharide production by Haloferax mediterranei.
IF 3.5 3区 生物学Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Alaa M Al Rawahi, Mohd Zafar, Taqi Ahmed Khan, Sara Al Araimi, Biswanath Mahanty, Shishir Kumar Behera
{"title":"Genetic algorithm-optimized artificial neural network for multi-objective optimization of biomass and exopolysaccharide production by Haloferax mediterranei.","authors":"Alaa M Al Rawahi, Mohd Zafar, Taqi Ahmed Khan, Sara Al Araimi, Biswanath Mahanty, Shishir Kumar Behera","doi":"10.1007/s00449-025-03143-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microbial production of industrially important exopolysaccharide (EPS) from extremophiles has several advantages. In this study, key media components (i.e., sucrose, yeast extract, and urea) were optimized for biomass growth and extracellular EPS production in Haloferax mediterranei DSM 1411 using Box-Behnken design. In a multi-objective optimization framework, response surface methodology (RSM) and genetic algorithm (GA)-optimized artificial neural network (ANN) were used to minimize biomass growth while increasing EPS production. The performance of the selected ANN model for the prediction of biomass and EPS (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.964 and 0.975, respectively) was found to be better than that of the multiple regression model (R<sup>2</sup>: 0.818, 0.963, respectively). The main effect of sucrose and its interaction with urea appears to have a significant effect on both responses. The ANN model projects an increase in EPS production from 4.49 to 18.2 g l<sup>-1</sup> while shifting the priority from biomass to biopolymer. The optimized condition predicted a maximum biomass and EPS production of 17.27 g l<sup>-1</sup> and 17.80 g l<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, at concentrations of sucrose (19.98 g l<sup>-1</sup>), yeast extract (1.97 g l<sup>-1</sup>), and urea (1.99 g l<sup>-1</sup>). Based on multi-objective optimization, the GA-ANN model predicted an increase in the EPS to biomass ratio for increasing the EPS and associated biomass production. The extracted EPS, identified as Gellan gum through NMR spectroscopy, was further characterized for surface and elemental composition using SEM-EDX analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9024,"journal":{"name":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"785-798"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-025-03143-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Microbial production of industrially important exopolysaccharide (EPS) from extremophiles has several advantages. In this study, key media components (i.e., sucrose, yeast extract, and urea) were optimized for biomass growth and extracellular EPS production in Haloferax mediterranei DSM 1411 using Box-Behnken design. In a multi-objective optimization framework, response surface methodology (RSM) and genetic algorithm (GA)-optimized artificial neural network (ANN) were used to minimize biomass growth while increasing EPS production. The performance of the selected ANN model for the prediction of biomass and EPS (R2: 0.964 and 0.975, respectively) was found to be better than that of the multiple regression model (R2: 0.818, 0.963, respectively). The main effect of sucrose and its interaction with urea appears to have a significant effect on both responses. The ANN model projects an increase in EPS production from 4.49 to 18.2 g l-1 while shifting the priority from biomass to biopolymer. The optimized condition predicted a maximum biomass and EPS production of 17.27 g l-1 and 17.80 g l-1, respectively, at concentrations of sucrose (19.98 g l-1), yeast extract (1.97 g l-1), and urea (1.99 g l-1). Based on multi-objective optimization, the GA-ANN model predicted an increase in the EPS to biomass ratio for increasing the EPS and associated biomass production. The extracted EPS, identified as Gellan gum through NMR spectroscopy, was further characterized for surface and elemental composition using SEM-EDX analysis.
期刊介绍:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering provides an international peer-reviewed forum to facilitate the discussion between engineering and biological science to find efficient solutions in the development and improvement of bioprocesses. The aim of the journal is to focus more attention on the multidisciplinary approaches for integrative bioprocess design. Of special interest are the rational manipulation of biosystems through metabolic engineering techniques to provide new biocatalysts as well as the model based design of bioprocesses (up-stream processing, bioreactor operation and downstream processing) that will lead to new and sustainable production processes.
Contributions are targeted at new approaches for rational and evolutive design of cellular systems by taking into account the environment and constraints of technical production processes, integration of recombinant technology and process design, as well as new hybrid intersections such as bioinformatics and process systems engineering. Manuscripts concerning the design, simulation, experimental validation, control, and economic as well as ecological evaluation of novel processes using biosystems or parts thereof (e.g., enzymes, microorganisms, mammalian cells, plant cells, or tissue), their related products, or technical devices are also encouraged.
The Editors will consider papers for publication based on novelty, their impact on biotechnological production and their contribution to the advancement of bioprocess and biosystems engineering science. Submission of papers dealing with routine aspects of bioprocess engineering (e.g., routine application of established methodologies, and description of established equipment) are discouraged.