The Prevalence of Neuromyths Among K-12 English Language Teachers

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Gursen Sisman, Dilara Demirbulak, Ayse Yilmaz Virlan
{"title":"The Prevalence of Neuromyths Among K-12 English Language Teachers","authors":"Gursen Sisman,&nbsp;Dilara Demirbulak,&nbsp;Ayse Yilmaz Virlan","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This descriptive study aimed to investigate neuromyth prevalence among English language teachers. Data were collected through a digital questionnaire administered to 114 English teachers in Istanbul, Turkey, with the mediation of the Ministry of National Education (MoNE). Most participants were female secondary school teachers working at public schools. The questionnaire measured the acceptance of eight common neuromyths and the correlation between neuromyth acceptance and variables including sex, institution level, institution type, professional experience, age and educational level. The results reveal a positive correlation between general knowledge of brain function and neuroeducation and neuromyth acceptance. The top three neuromyths held by the participants were that visual–auditory–kinaesthetic learning styles affect learning effectiveness, preschoolers benefit from stimulating environments and brain hemispheric dominance explains learning differences among individuals. These findings underscore the need for targeted professional development programmes to address and rectify neuromyths among educators to enhance the quality of instruction in language classrooms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This descriptive study aimed to investigate neuromyth prevalence among English language teachers. Data were collected through a digital questionnaire administered to 114 English teachers in Istanbul, Turkey, with the mediation of the Ministry of National Education (MoNE). Most participants were female secondary school teachers working at public schools. The questionnaire measured the acceptance of eight common neuromyths and the correlation between neuromyth acceptance and variables including sex, institution level, institution type, professional experience, age and educational level. The results reveal a positive correlation between general knowledge of brain function and neuroeducation and neuromyth acceptance. The top three neuromyths held by the participants were that visual–auditory–kinaesthetic learning styles affect learning effectiveness, preschoolers benefit from stimulating environments and brain hemispheric dominance explains learning differences among individuals. These findings underscore the need for targeted professional development programmes to address and rectify neuromyths among educators to enhance the quality of instruction in language classrooms.

Abstract Image

中小学英语教师中神经神话的盛行
这项描述性研究旨在调查英语教师中神经肌瘤的发病率。在土耳其国家教育部(MoNE)的协助下,研究人员对土耳其伊斯坦布尔的 114 名英语教师进行了数字问卷调查,并收集了相关数据。大多数参与者是在公立学校工作的中学女教师。问卷调查了对八种常见神经症的接受程度,以及神经症接受程度与性别、机构级别、机构类型、专业经验、年龄和教育水平等变量之间的相关性。结果显示,大脑功能和神经教育常识与神经迷信接受度之间存在正相关。被调查者认为最重要的三个神经理论是:视觉-听觉-动觉学习方式影响学习效率、学龄前儿童受益于刺激性环境以及大脑半球优势解释了个体之间的学习差异。这些研究结果表明,有必要开展有针对性的专业发展计划,以解决和纠正教育工作者的神经迷思,从而提高语文课堂的教学质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信