Researching China's Pre-Service Teachers' Perceptions of AI Education for K-12: An Elicited Metaphor Analysis

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Xing Hu, Wen Gong, Martin Cortazzi
{"title":"Researching China's Pre-Service Teachers' Perceptions of AI Education for K-12: An Elicited Metaphor Analysis","authors":"Xing Hu,&nbsp;Wen Gong,&nbsp;Martin Cortazzi","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>As Artificial Intelligence (AI) increasingly becomes integral to educational development, understanding how future educators perceive AI Education (AIEd) is crucial for the effective implementation of AI in school curricula to embed AI technologies throughout the age ranges of kindergarten to grade 12 (K-12). The present study employed elicited metaphor analysis (EMA), an innovative qualitative method that elicits participants' conceptualisations through metaphors, to examine the perspectives of pre-service teachers in China towards AIEd in K-12. We analysed a database of 463 metaphors with entailments, obtained via an online questionnaire returned by 265 pre-service teachers in three Normal Universities in China. Seven major conceptual themes were identified: AI is ‘Guidance’, ‘Growth’, ‘Resources’, ‘Discovery’, ‘Opportunity’, ‘Challenge’ and has a ‘Dual Nature’ of exerting both positive and negative influences on education. Sentiment analysis revealed the pre-service teachers' overall attitudes towards AI as positive (62%), negative (12%) and ambiguous or neutral (26%). It was also found that among participants' background factors, attitudinal differences were identified between those who have received AIEd exposure in classrooms and those who have not. These seem indicative of a cohort of future educators' opinions regarding AIEd in China. These findings could inform teacher training or policymaking, highlighting that clear policies are needed to regulate AI use in classrooms, AI education should be progressively integrated into K-12 curricula, and pre-service teachers' existing AI expertise should be acknowledged earlier in their training, as they in the future could be AI mediators for professional colleagues.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) increasingly becomes integral to educational development, understanding how future educators perceive AI Education (AIEd) is crucial for the effective implementation of AI in school curricula to embed AI technologies throughout the age ranges of kindergarten to grade 12 (K-12). The present study employed elicited metaphor analysis (EMA), an innovative qualitative method that elicits participants' conceptualisations through metaphors, to examine the perspectives of pre-service teachers in China towards AIEd in K-12. We analysed a database of 463 metaphors with entailments, obtained via an online questionnaire returned by 265 pre-service teachers in three Normal Universities in China. Seven major conceptual themes were identified: AI is ‘Guidance’, ‘Growth’, ‘Resources’, ‘Discovery’, ‘Opportunity’, ‘Challenge’ and has a ‘Dual Nature’ of exerting both positive and negative influences on education. Sentiment analysis revealed the pre-service teachers' overall attitudes towards AI as positive (62%), negative (12%) and ambiguous or neutral (26%). It was also found that among participants' background factors, attitudinal differences were identified between those who have received AIEd exposure in classrooms and those who have not. These seem indicative of a cohort of future educators' opinions regarding AIEd in China. These findings could inform teacher training or policymaking, highlighting that clear policies are needed to regulate AI use in classrooms, AI education should be progressively integrated into K-12 curricula, and pre-service teachers' existing AI expertise should be acknowledged earlier in their training, as they in the future could be AI mediators for professional colleagues.

中国职前教师对K-12阶段人工智能教育的认知研究:引出隐喻分析
随着人工智能(AI)日益成为教育发展不可或缺的一部分,了解未来教育者如何看待人工智能教育(AIEd)对于在学校课程中有效实施人工智能以将人工智能技术嵌入幼儿园到12年级(K-12)的整个年龄范围至关重要。本研究采用引出隐喻分析(EMA),一种创新的定性方法,通过隐喻引出参与者的概念化,来研究中国K-12职前教师对AIEd的看法。我们分析了一个包含463个隐喻的数据库,这些隐喻是通过对中国三所师范大学265名职前教师的在线问卷调查获得的。确定了七个主要概念主题:人工智能是“指导”、“成长”、“资源”、“发现”、“机会”、“挑战”,并且具有对教育产生积极和消极影响的“双重性”。情绪分析显示,职前教师对人工智能的总体态度为积极(62%)、消极(12%)、模糊或中立(26%)。在参与者的背景因素中,在课堂上接受过AIEd教育的学生和没有接受过AIEd教育的学生之间存在态度差异。这些似乎表明了一群未来教育工作者对中国人工智能教育的看法。这些发现可以为教师培训或政策制定提供信息,强调需要明确的政策来规范人工智能在课堂上的使用,人工智能教育应逐步纳入K-12课程,职前教师现有的人工智能专业知识应在培训中及早得到承认,因为他们未来可能成为专业同事的人工智能调解人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信