{"title":"Researching China's Pre-Service Teachers' Perceptions of AI Education for K-12: An Elicited Metaphor Analysis","authors":"Xing Hu, Wen Gong, Martin Cortazzi","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>As Artificial Intelligence (AI) increasingly becomes integral to educational development, understanding how future educators perceive AI Education (AIEd) is crucial for the effective implementation of AI in school curricula to embed AI technologies throughout the age ranges of kindergarten to grade 12 (K-12). The present study employed elicited metaphor analysis (EMA), an innovative qualitative method that elicits participants' conceptualisations through metaphors, to examine the perspectives of pre-service teachers in China towards AIEd in K-12. We analysed a database of 463 metaphors with entailments, obtained via an online questionnaire returned by 265 pre-service teachers in three Normal Universities in China. Seven major conceptual themes were identified: AI is ‘Guidance’, ‘Growth’, ‘Resources’, ‘Discovery’, ‘Opportunity’, ‘Challenge’ and has a ‘Dual Nature’ of exerting both positive and negative influences on education. Sentiment analysis revealed the pre-service teachers' overall attitudes towards AI as positive (62%), negative (12%) and ambiguous or neutral (26%). It was also found that among participants' background factors, attitudinal differences were identified between those who have received AIEd exposure in classrooms and those who have not. These seem indicative of a cohort of future educators' opinions regarding AIEd in China. These findings could inform teacher training or policymaking, highlighting that clear policies are needed to regulate AI use in classrooms, AI education should be progressively integrated into K-12 curricula, and pre-service teachers' existing AI expertise should be acknowledged earlier in their training, as they in the future could be AI mediators for professional colleagues.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) increasingly becomes integral to educational development, understanding how future educators perceive AI Education (AIEd) is crucial for the effective implementation of AI in school curricula to embed AI technologies throughout the age ranges of kindergarten to grade 12 (K-12). The present study employed elicited metaphor analysis (EMA), an innovative qualitative method that elicits participants' conceptualisations through metaphors, to examine the perspectives of pre-service teachers in China towards AIEd in K-12. We analysed a database of 463 metaphors with entailments, obtained via an online questionnaire returned by 265 pre-service teachers in three Normal Universities in China. Seven major conceptual themes were identified: AI is ‘Guidance’, ‘Growth’, ‘Resources’, ‘Discovery’, ‘Opportunity’, ‘Challenge’ and has a ‘Dual Nature’ of exerting both positive and negative influences on education. Sentiment analysis revealed the pre-service teachers' overall attitudes towards AI as positive (62%), negative (12%) and ambiguous or neutral (26%). It was also found that among participants' background factors, attitudinal differences were identified between those who have received AIEd exposure in classrooms and those who have not. These seem indicative of a cohort of future educators' opinions regarding AIEd in China. These findings could inform teacher training or policymaking, highlighting that clear policies are needed to regulate AI use in classrooms, AI education should be progressively integrated into K-12 curricula, and pre-service teachers' existing AI expertise should be acknowledged earlier in their training, as they in the future could be AI mediators for professional colleagues.
期刊介绍:
The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.