Description of liquid–vapor transition behaviors in evaporative cooling technologies: A critical review

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Zhijun Tian , Yanfeng Liu , Yaowen Chen , Cong Song , Dengjia Wang
{"title":"Description of liquid–vapor transition behaviors in evaporative cooling technologies: A critical review","authors":"Zhijun Tian ,&nbsp;Yanfeng Liu ,&nbsp;Yaowen Chen ,&nbsp;Cong Song ,&nbsp;Dengjia Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaporative cooling technology benefits from the substantial latent heat released during the liquid–vapor phase transition process. A comprehensive understanding of the physical nature of phase transition is fundamental to this technology. This review provides an analysis of the theoretical foundations of the liquid–vapor transition, drawing on thermodynamics, kinetic theory, and relevant practical formulas. Additionally, the pertinent knowledge of hydrodynamics, particularly the description of vapor transport, is summarized. Subsequently, current models are reviewed from the perspective of the interplay between the liquid–vapor transition and vapor transport processes. The descriptions and limitations of phase transition processes in these models are then discussed. According to these analyses, a key distinction in the description of the liquid–vapor transition lies in the presence or absence of evaporative mass flux. Kirchhoff-type formulas describe a macroscopic steady-state liquid–vapor transition in equilibrium. The use of these formulas negates external environmental influences on the transition process, including boundary layer effects. Hertz-Knudsen-type formulas capture the essence of the process, although they make overly strict assumptions about surface geometry. It is, therefore, recommended that these accommodation coefficients be verified experimentally. The enthalpy difference models, also known as Merkel models, impose additional isobaric constraints on the isothermal process, making them suitable for working conditions where pressure remains relatively constant throughout the process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"336 ","pages":"Article 115646"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825003767","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaporative cooling technology benefits from the substantial latent heat released during the liquid–vapor phase transition process. A comprehensive understanding of the physical nature of phase transition is fundamental to this technology. This review provides an analysis of the theoretical foundations of the liquid–vapor transition, drawing on thermodynamics, kinetic theory, and relevant practical formulas. Additionally, the pertinent knowledge of hydrodynamics, particularly the description of vapor transport, is summarized. Subsequently, current models are reviewed from the perspective of the interplay between the liquid–vapor transition and vapor transport processes. The descriptions and limitations of phase transition processes in these models are then discussed. According to these analyses, a key distinction in the description of the liquid–vapor transition lies in the presence or absence of evaporative mass flux. Kirchhoff-type formulas describe a macroscopic steady-state liquid–vapor transition in equilibrium. The use of these formulas negates external environmental influences on the transition process, including boundary layer effects. Hertz-Knudsen-type formulas capture the essence of the process, although they make overly strict assumptions about surface geometry. It is, therefore, recommended that these accommodation coefficients be verified experimentally. The enthalpy difference models, also known as Merkel models, impose additional isobaric constraints on the isothermal process, making them suitable for working conditions where pressure remains relatively constant throughout the process.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信