A novel framework for the assessment of indoor lighting solutions and its application for model learning spaces of a higher educational institution considering energy efficiency and human factors

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Sourin Bhattacharya , Susmita Bhattacharya , Abhishek Das , Shibsankar Mahata , Sujash Biswas
{"title":"A novel framework for the assessment of indoor lighting solutions and its application for model learning spaces of a higher educational institution considering energy efficiency and human factors","authors":"Sourin Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Susmita Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Abhishek Das ,&nbsp;Shibsankar Mahata ,&nbsp;Sujash Biswas","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Indoor lighting planning, design, and commissioning should be performed with a panoptic view of financial incurrences, energy efficiency, photometric parameters, non-visual aspects, and human factors, and a practicable indoor lighting assessment framework can make thorough evaluations of proffered lighting designs of indoor spaces including classrooms of educational institutions. This study presents a comprehensive indoor lighting assessment framework, formulated with the assistance of the Delphi method of reaching expert consensus and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) of assigning weightage to each criterion, with three distinct criteria or rubrics: Energy Efficiency and Financial Aspects (EFFA), Visual and Non-Visual Effects (VNVE), and Occupants’ Perception and Comfort (OPC). A maximum composite score of 5 is awarded for each proffered lighting solution. This framework was applied for the evaluation of several candidate lighting solutions based on incandescent, fluorescent, and light-emitting diode (LED) lamps for model learning spaces of a higher educational institution in West Bengal, India, and the LED Downlight-based lighting system with a Correlated Colour Temperature (CCT) of 4816 K of a model lecture theatre received the highest composite score of 4.00 out of 5.00 and maximized OPC (4.61 out of 5.00). In addition, LED-based lighting systems outscored the conventional counterparts by at least 7.85 %. The novelty of the introduced framework lies in its emphasis on interlacing energy performance, financial incurrences, ergonomics, and visual comfort in a unified evaluation model, offering a pragmatic-cum-productivist tool for indoor lighting design and assessment, particularly in regions and provinces lacking formal ergonomic lighting design and evaluation regulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"336 ","pages":"Article 115625"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037877882500355X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indoor lighting planning, design, and commissioning should be performed with a panoptic view of financial incurrences, energy efficiency, photometric parameters, non-visual aspects, and human factors, and a practicable indoor lighting assessment framework can make thorough evaluations of proffered lighting designs of indoor spaces including classrooms of educational institutions. This study presents a comprehensive indoor lighting assessment framework, formulated with the assistance of the Delphi method of reaching expert consensus and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) of assigning weightage to each criterion, with three distinct criteria or rubrics: Energy Efficiency and Financial Aspects (EFFA), Visual and Non-Visual Effects (VNVE), and Occupants’ Perception and Comfort (OPC). A maximum composite score of 5 is awarded for each proffered lighting solution. This framework was applied for the evaluation of several candidate lighting solutions based on incandescent, fluorescent, and light-emitting diode (LED) lamps for model learning spaces of a higher educational institution in West Bengal, India, and the LED Downlight-based lighting system with a Correlated Colour Temperature (CCT) of 4816 K of a model lecture theatre received the highest composite score of 4.00 out of 5.00 and maximized OPC (4.61 out of 5.00). In addition, LED-based lighting systems outscored the conventional counterparts by at least 7.85 %. The novelty of the introduced framework lies in its emphasis on interlacing energy performance, financial incurrences, ergonomics, and visual comfort in a unified evaluation model, offering a pragmatic-cum-productivist tool for indoor lighting design and assessment, particularly in regions and provinces lacking formal ergonomic lighting design and evaluation regulations.
评估室内照明解决方案的新框架及其在考虑能源效率和人为因素的高等教育机构示范学习空间中的应用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信